Archive for the ‘Underage sex’ Category

Is it child porn if the pictures are of your wife?

Friday, October 29th, 2010

Porn charges have been dropped against a 24 year old ex-cop who has since married the 17 year old girl in the pictures.

Investigators said that while the sexual relationship between White and the girl was legal, his possession of nude images of her was not.

The age of consent in Missouri is 17.  Sex between the two is okay, photography is not.   What kind of complete fucking moron do you have to be to invent such stupid laws, anyway?

Prosecutor Dean Dankelson says he had to drop the charges last week because the girl could not be forced to testify against her husband.

Life’s a bitch Dean.

The above link was stolen from theagitator.com.

Some links from the comments on that page are also interesting:

Breast feeding picture gets mom charged with child porn

Couple sues over bathtime photos

She made me do it…

Friday, April 9th, 2010

A 33 year old Minnesota woman has been sentenced to home detention and probation for exchanging 1600 explicit text messages with a 15 year old boy.  She alsosent him a picture of her bare breasts and “forced” him to touch them.

In addition to the probation and home detention she will have to undergo a re-education sex offender treatment program and register as a “predatory offender”.

If there is anything these cases have in common, it’s that journalists never question to what degree the juvenile participated or suffered injury as a result of the so-called crime.  At what pint during the 1600 messages did he come to the conclusion that he was being ‘forced’ to participate?

In any case, life as she knew it, is over and I seriously doubt that the 15 year old kid gains anything by her severe punishment.  And make no mistake, being classified as a sexual predator essentially will certainly ruin the rest of her life.

Not mentioned in the above story is the fact that it was actually the woman’s husband who outed them when he discovered the messages and decided to go looking for the guy.

Sex education nonsense in Wisconsin

Thursday, April 8th, 2010

According to a story on cnn.com, teachers in Juneau County Wisconsin are being warned that if they teach kids the sex education curriculum specified by law, they could find themselves facing charges of contributing to the delinquency of a minor.

Because the law requires teachers to instruct children not only about contraceptives but about how to use them, Juneau County District Attorney Scott Southworth said, schools are forced to encourage students to “engage in sexual behavior, whether as a victim or an offender.”

And since minors can’t legally have sex in Wisconsin, teachers would essentially be endorsing the behavior and could be held liable, Southworth said in the letter.

Yeah, Scott.  Better that the kids should find out about safe sex from their doctor when he’s treating them for some STD or from their OB/GYN after they get pregnant.  This reminds me of Texas conservatives objecting to HPV vaccine because it could eliminate the cervical cancer that they consider to be a handy deterrent to teen sex.  Next we’ll be telling teens they can’t use seat belts because it encourages reckless driving.

The law doesn’t force any schools to teach the sex education classes, but it sets out strict guidelines on what should be taught in the schools that choose to do so. The law passed narrowly in the legislature and was the topic of a fierce battle between Republicans and Democrats: No Republicans voted for it, and it was signed by a Democratic governor.

Has anyone else noticed how the two political parties seem to be so completely absorbed with fighting each other that common sense is completely lost?  If one party came up with a way to cure cancer, the other party would oppose it simply because it wasn’t their cure.

Rep. Kelda Helen Roys, a Democrat, told the Wisconsin State Journal that she believes there’s no problem with the law.

She said Southworth, a Republican, is a “zealot” who wrote the letter to try to scare people out of teaching the sexual education classes.

Well, you know, all serious crime has probably been eliminated in Wisconsin, so prosecutors have nothing else to do but target teachers.

“The teacher could be charged with the crime even if the child does not actually engage in the criminal behavior [of having sex as a minor],” Southworth wrote.

If democrats really wanted to do something positive with their legislative majority on Wisconsin, they’d grow a set of balls and scrap the law that turns kids into criminals for having sex.

Another teacher-student sex scandal

Wednesday, March 10th, 2010

A Burbank California teacer has admitted to having an affair with a 14 year old males student.  According to the AP report:

With her attorney by her side, police say, Amy Victoria Beck told detectives the relationship with one of her former students began in March 2009 and continued until last December. She said it left her wracked with guilt.

I’ll reserve judgment on the guilt part until I hear more about it.  There is probably a lot more to this story that will take time to come out.  It’s interesting to note she came forward on her own and the boy merely confirmed what she told police.

The 33-year-old teacher, who has been charged with five counts of engaging in sex acts with a person under 16, appeared briefly in court Wednesday before returning to jail. She is scheduled to be arraigned March 25 and faces as much as seven years in prison if convicted.

What I always find interesting about cases like this is the fact that it’s taken for granted that this poor child has been tragically victimized by an adult, but if he had had an affair with someone his own age, it would probably be chalked up as being within the range of normal teen behavior.   In effect, what makes this so serious is not the sex, but the fact that it happened with an adult.  Why is it automatically assumed that a wide age spread necessarily results in greater injury to the victim?

And then to top off the over-reaction, there’s this:

After learning she’d been arrested, officials sent psychologists to the school to counsel students.

The counseling racket is really becoming a growth industry.    Of course, children are such fragile little flowers…

Extra small condoms & safe sex for preteens

Thursday, March 4th, 2010

A Swiss company is marketing a small condom for 12-year-old boys in response to a government study showing more 12 to 14-year-olds are having sex these days.

Nysse Norballe, a spokesman for the company, said: “At the moment we are only producing the Hotshot in Switzerland.  [...]  The UK would definitely be top priority if we marketed abroad.”

[...]

The UK has the highest teenage pregnancy rate in Europe.

In the U.S. it is unlikely a smaller condom would get much support since many see diseases and pregnancy as a good deterrent to shameful underage sex.

Georgia apparently prosecutes child prostitutes

Sunday, February 7th, 2010

According to this opinion piece by Johnathan McGinty in the Athens Banner-Herald, Georgia State Sen. Renee Unterman, (R-Buford) wants to introduce a bill that would prevent Georgia from treating children picked up for prostitution like criminals and instead provide some kind of treatment.

Imagine your 12-year-old daughter has been kidnapped and, when she’s finally found, she’s been forced into a child prostitution ring. Imagine that she’s kept in a drug-induced haze and raped repeatedly. Imagine the horror, grief and shock that would overwhelm you and your family as you dealt with that situation, and the work you’d be eager to do to heal your daughter.

And now, in the middle of that trying and sensitive situation, imagine that the state of Georgia is labeling her a criminal.

So, the implication is that kids are being kidnapped, forced into prostitution, and when they are discovered, the state further victimizes them by prosecuting them.  Presumably this happens quite regularly since, according to McGinty, there are more than 400 child prostitutes in Atlanta alone, although the only case mentioned is from 2002.

McGinty describes why some oppose the legislation:

The current system, and the logic employed by those who so strenuously defend it, is seriously flawed. Rather than pursue justice against those who actually exploit young boys and girls, detractors of the proposed legislation would rather throw the victims in jail.

Yeah, I can see it now.  A child prostitution ring is uncovered and an angry mob storms the courthouse demanding the prosecution of the children and the immediate release of the pimps.

Mr McGinty needs to re-evaluate his strategy for conveying credibility.  This story doesn’t pass the smell test.

You have to love how both sides invoke the mantra “for the children”, though.  Of course, it’s not “exploitation” when politicians leverage off of children to advance their own personal careers.

Looks like a solution in search of a problem.  At the very least, Mr McGinty is probably leaving out some rather key facts.  I seriously doubt Georgia is prosecuting children who have been kidnapped and forced into prostitution.

And if Senator Unterman really wants to help children, she should consider legalizing prostitution, removing it from the shadowy criminal underground out into the light of day, giving those in the business an incentive to stay on the right side of the law.   When government outlaws consensual human behavior, they surrender all control over and visibility into that behavior.   It amounts to nothing more than a worthless  jobs program for cops while creating a fertile environment for corruption.  And because it makes one group of people miserable at the behest of another group of people,  it’s the definition of persecution.

Surveilance for ratings, Fresno style.

Saturday, February 6th, 2010

The ABC TV affiliate in Fresno, CA, has apparently been staking out local motels as part of a crusade to ferret out prostitution.  Working out of motels is “more lucrative than walking the streets and it’s much safer”, not that safety is a big concern when ratings can be had by chasing them back out on the street.

Then, of course, there’s the incontestable obligatory “for the children” justification:

Of the 300 plus citations written in 2009, 13 were written to juveniles under 18. Several were 13-year-old girls.

At least she doesn’t go into a dissertation about how the women are involuntary slaves to a patriarchal society.

One thing is clear, demand is high. Making quick cash is easy and misdemeanor tickets aren’t enough of a deterrent to discourage men or women from turning away.

The police chief seems to have a pretty accurrate perspective:

Fresno Police Chief Jerry Dyer said, “I think the only way to eliminate prostitution is to eliminate sin and that’s not gonna happen.

Not that it keeps him from making the lives of these women (and men) as miserable as he can.

This past year police made a record number of arrests for prostitution related crimes. Some people we talked to out here assume that’s what brought about the new preferred way of doing business.

I wonder exactly what “prostitution related” crimes they’re referring to.  My guess is that if they were doing a story on illegal drugs, prostitution would be considered a “drug related crime”.

No doubt, Sontaya Rose thinks her exposé is making the world a better place, but really all she’s doing is feeding off easy prey.

Australia: No more itty bitty titties.

Saturday, January 30th, 2010

There used to be a saying among Australians: “Thank god we got the criminals and the Americans got the Puritans.” Well, like a flesh eating plague, the puritans have apparently found their way to Australia.

The Australian Sex Party sent out a press release claiming that the Australian Classification Board is going to refuse classification to films and video showing depictions of female ejaculation or women with small breasts, thereby banning such material.  By the way, why don’t they just call it what it is, the Australian Censorship Board?

In any case, the government admits that it will reject adult films that depict females who appear to be under age, regardless of whether they actually are under age.  Despite any protestation to the contrary, it doesn’t take a rocket scientist to see how, in their subjective analysis of how old a girl appears to be, breast size (and shaved pubic hair perhaps?) would certainly be a significant factor.  True to the anti-sex crusader’s agenda, this clearly shows that their concern is far less about protecting real children and more about punishing those whose fantasies they don’t approve of.

As for the female ejaculation ban, the censorship board has in the past simply declared that it doesn’t exist, therefore the actors must be urinating which is banned.  However, they came under attack for that assertion and backed down a bit.

Of course, in a free country, none of these depictions would be banned and the people attracting public scorn would be those who want to control other people’s lives.

Even a child knows that what he sees on TV is not real and yet crusaders against sex invariably conflate the fiction of sex films with real life.  Like the liberal feminists of the 80s who declared that pornography and rape are the same thing, it requires very little reflection to see through such an imbecilic ploy.

Using a woman in a movie who looks under age is not the same as using a child.  And a fantasy about sex with someone under age is not the same as a sex act with child.  There is no evidence to suggest that porn leads to rape or that child porn leads to child rape or that violent video games make people shoot up their classmates or associates.

Censorship is a disgusting stain on the concept of a free state and I wish the Australian Sex Party success in their mission to alert the public to the dangers that come from a government that arrogantly thinks it has the right to isolate the population from ideas of which it doesn’t approve.

Should the age of consent be lowered?

Sunday, January 3rd, 2010

Huffington Post has an interesting article on age of consent throughout the western world.    Touchy topic since many people who oppose lowering the age of consent treat the suggestion of doing so as a sign of perversion by itself.

Another Sexting Suicide

Sunday, December 13th, 2009

Thirteen year old Hope Witsell of Florida hanged herself after being on the receiving end of harassment and bullying when a nude picture she sent to her boyfriend started making the rounds at school.

Not only is sexting being reported as a cause of suicide, it is also responsible for child porn prosecutions of children, both on the sending and receiving end.  And, as anyone who watches the news can tell you, a child porn conviction basically marks the end of a normal life.

The idea that sending a nude picture of yourself (lewd or not) should elicit anything more than idle comment from friends or acquaintances is evidence of the irrational attitude people in the U.S. have toward sex. Any way you slice it, nudity harms no one. In fact the only harm to befall someone from being seen naked is administered by the very people who warn against it. It’s like telling a kid that making funny faces will injure their face and then punching them when they do it. The idiocy is almost unquantifiable.

It’s especially confusing to kids because they haven’t fully integrated our insanely irrational attitudes about sex, so they only discover the horrific sociological repercussions of flirting with sexual taboos when it lands on them like a ton of bricks.

Life destroying persecution, castigation, and psychological torture are society’s way of teaching people that there are consequences for “marching to the beat of a different drummer”.    If there is anything inherently wrong with sexting, it is far overshadowed by the consummate evil visited on the person who does it by the public in the name of morality.