Archive for the ‘statutory rape’ Category

Another sex crazed teacher story

Thursday, January 6th, 2011

A 27 tear old female dance teacher in Plainfield, Illinois is accused of having sex with her 16 year old student.

Ashley Blumenshine was arrested behind a department store in Plainfield, Illinois, after police caught her in a car with the teen.

Police believe that they had had sex shortly before the officers arrived.

The high school teacher is being held in custody charged with having sex with the student. Her attorney said she is innocent.

She taught dance and physical education at Plainfield North High School for four years and is known for her popularity. The boy is a junior at the school.

Assistant Will County State’s Attorney Mary Fillipitch said both occupants admitted they had just engaged in consensual sexual intercourse.

A condom was taken as evidence from the vehicle.

The following day, the Will County State’s Attorney’s office charged Blumenshine with aggravated criminal sexual abuse.

The article says the affair had been going on for about a month. The kid is 16.  The age of consent in Illinois is generally 17, but in this case it’s 18 since she is “a person of authority or trust” over him.   Of course, by the time he’s 18 he will become magically transformed from someone who is incapable of consenting to sex to someone who is actively encouraged by the government to become cannon fodder in some god forsaken desert on the other side of the planet.

I wonder what would have happened if they had both kept their mouths shut.  I hope the kid refuses to testify.  Without knowing anymore than what’s in the article, I would venture to say he has not been injured in the least by the affair but will suffer substantial guilt if they force him to assist in destroying this teacher’s life.  I would probably regret it for the rest of my life.  Unfortunately, kids are steeped in the propaganda of sex hysteria and the idea that cops and prosecutors are always the good guys.

Is it child porn if the pictures are of your wife?

Friday, October 29th, 2010

Porn charges have been dropped against a 24 year old ex-cop who has since married the 17 year old girl in the pictures.

Investigators said that while the sexual relationship between White and the girl was legal, his possession of nude images of her was not.

The age of consent in Missouri is 17.  Sex between the two is okay, photography is not.   What kind of complete fucking moron do you have to be to invent such stupid laws, anyway?

Prosecutor Dean Dankelson says he had to drop the charges last week because the girl could not be forced to testify against her husband.

Life’s a bitch Dean.

The above link was stolen from theagitator.com.

Some links from the comments on that page are also interesting:

Breast feeding picture gets mom charged with child porn

Couple sues over bathtime photos

Woman, 34, assaults boy, 15. Boy goes back for seconds.

Saturday, August 7th, 2010

The Charleston Daily Mail reports yet another story of a boy who was found to have been having consensual sex with an older woman, almost every boy’s dream.  Of course, the boy’s mother wants the woman charged with sexual assault.

The teen told deputies he first met Tetso three months ago and that he was a friend of her three children. He said he walked over to her home in the first week of June to ask her about a job babysitting her children. He told the deputy that he became attracted to her and that they decided to have sex in her bedroom. They were alone in the house.

He said they had sex twice more in July. He told deputies that he knew she was 34 years old. The teen described the woman’s bedroom and tattoos on her body as well.

Because the near complete vacuum of objectivity regarding teen sex, society tends to view any sexual activity between teens and adults (and often even between teens and other teens) as the worst kind of assault imaginable.  Indeed, even murder invokes less reaction and often less punishment than mutually consensual sex.

Assuming this woman is caught and convicted, this boy stands to live the rest of his life feeling as if activities he willingly engaged in helped to destroy someone he obviously had no desire to hurt.

Stories about women being prosecuted for sexual encounters with teen boys are becoming more and more common.  I’ve written about it before here and here.

One would hope that, sometime soon, Americans will emerge from the sexual dark ages and accept that the sex drive starts before some state-defined age of consent and that entertaining that drive is not a crime.

Thanks to reader MacGregory for the link to this story.

Tonight on Stossel: Sex and the Law

Thursday, July 29th, 2010

From his blog on the Fox Business website:

Tonight’s Stossel is all about sex and the law. (FBN @9pm ET)  What are the rules?  I tackle several thorny issues, such as “don’t ask, don’t tell,” decency standards for broadcast television, pornography, and the age of consent.

For those unfamiliar with John Stossel, he is mot well known as a one-time consumer advocate and co-host of ABC’s 20/20 news program.  Over the years he became more libertarian and now has his own show on Fox Business Network dedicated to discussing and advocating those ideals, regularly criticizing government interference in people’s personal lives.   He invites guests from both sides of the issues with the libertarian perspective often being presented by members from respected  organizations like the Cato Institute and Reason Magazine.

Another teacher-student sex scandal

Wednesday, March 10th, 2010

A Burbank California teacer has admitted to having an affair with a 14 year old males student.  According to the AP report:

With her attorney by her side, police say, Amy Victoria Beck told detectives the relationship with one of her former students began in March 2009 and continued until last December. She said it left her wracked with guilt.

I’ll reserve judgment on the guilt part until I hear more about it.  There is probably a lot more to this story that will take time to come out.  It’s interesting to note she came forward on her own and the boy merely confirmed what she told police.

The 33-year-old teacher, who has been charged with five counts of engaging in sex acts with a person under 16, appeared briefly in court Wednesday before returning to jail. She is scheduled to be arraigned March 25 and faces as much as seven years in prison if convicted.

What I always find interesting about cases like this is the fact that it’s taken for granted that this poor child has been tragically victimized by an adult, but if he had had an affair with someone his own age, it would probably be chalked up as being within the range of normal teen behavior.   In effect, what makes this so serious is not the sex, but the fact that it happened with an adult.  Why is it automatically assumed that a wide age spread necessarily results in greater injury to the victim?

And then to top off the over-reaction, there’s this:

After learning she’d been arrested, officials sent psychologists to the school to counsel students.

The counseling racket is really becoming a growth industry.    Of course, children are such fragile little flowers…

Sex at 14 makes you a victim, but murder makes you an adult.

Tuesday, February 9th, 2010

Last week a 14 year old boy at a Madison, Alabama middle school shot and killed a classmate.  Of course, they’re withholding the name of the shooter because of his age.  And while they are carefully protecting his juvenile rights, they are busy deciding whether he should have any juvenile rights.

A judge will determine at a hearing Monday whether a Discovery Middle School student accused in the shooting death of a classmate will be charged as an adult, officials said Saturday.

So, how is it that a fourteen year old boy can be considered capable of adult responsibility for murder, but bears no responsibility if he has sex with someone a few years older than him?

Accidentally prosecuted and convicted of felony sex abuse

Monday, February 8th, 2010

When Richard Lee Simmons was 18, he had sex with his 15 year old girl friend.  The state of Oregon brought him before the grand jury, prosecuted him, and convicted him.  The only problem is that the grand jury never indicted him.  Everyone just assumed they came back with an indictment.

To make up for the error, the judge threw out the felony conviction and the prosecutor then brought a misdemeanor sex charge (which doesn’t need a grand jury).  Prosecutors don’t take kindly to grand juries that refuse to indict their ham sandwiches.

And now University of Oregon Law School graduate Steve Richkind is seeking to bring a $3.5 million civil rights suit against the state.

To botch the first prosecution and follow it with a second over the same conduct constitutes double jeopardy, “shocks the conscience” and “violates a universal sense of justice,” Richkind argues.

Having exhausted his options in the state courts and having lost at the federal district level, it will be interesting to see if he prevails with the Ninth Circuit.

Georgia apparently prosecutes child prostitutes

Sunday, February 7th, 2010

According to this opinion piece by Johnathan McGinty in the Athens Banner-Herald, Georgia State Sen. Renee Unterman, (R-Buford) wants to introduce a bill that would prevent Georgia from treating children picked up for prostitution like criminals and instead provide some kind of treatment.

Imagine your 12-year-old daughter has been kidnapped and, when she’s finally found, she’s been forced into a child prostitution ring. Imagine that she’s kept in a drug-induced haze and raped repeatedly. Imagine the horror, grief and shock that would overwhelm you and your family as you dealt with that situation, and the work you’d be eager to do to heal your daughter.

And now, in the middle of that trying and sensitive situation, imagine that the state of Georgia is labeling her a criminal.

So, the implication is that kids are being kidnapped, forced into prostitution, and when they are discovered, the state further victimizes them by prosecuting them.  Presumably this happens quite regularly since, according to McGinty, there are more than 400 child prostitutes in Atlanta alone, although the only case mentioned is from 2002.

McGinty describes why some oppose the legislation:

The current system, and the logic employed by those who so strenuously defend it, is seriously flawed. Rather than pursue justice against those who actually exploit young boys and girls, detractors of the proposed legislation would rather throw the victims in jail.

Yeah, I can see it now.  A child prostitution ring is uncovered and an angry mob storms the courthouse demanding the prosecution of the children and the immediate release of the pimps.

Mr McGinty needs to re-evaluate his strategy for conveying credibility.  This story doesn’t pass the smell test.

You have to love how both sides invoke the mantra “for the children”, though.  Of course, it’s not “exploitation” when politicians leverage off of children to advance their own personal careers.

Looks like a solution in search of a problem.  At the very least, Mr McGinty is probably leaving out some rather key facts.  I seriously doubt Georgia is prosecuting children who have been kidnapped and forced into prostitution.

And if Senator Unterman really wants to help children, she should consider legalizing prostitution, removing it from the shadowy criminal underground out into the light of day, giving those in the business an incentive to stay on the right side of the law.   When government outlaws consensual human behavior, they surrender all control over and visibility into that behavior.   It amounts to nothing more than a worthless  jobs program for cops while creating a fertile environment for corruption.  And because it makes one group of people miserable at the behest of another group of people,  it’s the definition of persecution.

Should the age of consent be lowered?

Sunday, January 3rd, 2010

Huffington Post has an interesting article on age of consent throughout the western world.    Touchy topic since many people who oppose lowering the age of consent treat the suggestion of doing so as a sign of perversion by itself.

15 Year Old Girl — Too young to consent?

Wednesday, November 18th, 2009

A 15 year old girl in Jefferson City, MO, will be tried as an adult for killing 9 year old Elizabeth Olten, just to see “what it felt like”.  If convicted of first degree murder, she would be sentenced to life without parole.

What has this to do with sex hysteria?  Just this.  If that same girl had sex with a boy a few years older than her, that boy could be convicted of statutory rape, sentenced to prison, and condemned to life as a registered sex offender.  The girl, who at 15 could not possibly give consent, would be presumed to be completely free from responsibility.

Can you babysit at 15?  Of course, because you’re deemed to be responsible enough to care for a child.  If you get pregnant, are you responsible enough to be allowed to keep the baby?  Of course!  If you kill someone, you’re certainly held to account just as would an adult and it doesn’t even raise an eyebrow.  But, have sex with someone older, and you bear no responsibility at all, even if you lie about your age.

What’s wrong with this picture?