Archive for the ‘Texas’ Category

TX censors by intimidation, but the show goes on

Thursday, April 8th, 2010

As I wrote a few days ago, officials in Texas publicly attacked and intimidated those involved with the controversial play, Corpus Christi, at Tarleton State University until the performance was ultimately canceled.

Well, it turns out the play may go on, but at a larger non-profit venue in Fort Worth about 70 miles from the university.

The 250-seat Rose Marine Theater and several co-producers will bring John Jordan Otte’s production of Corpus Christi to the stage next month, executive director Adam Adolfo said Wednesday. A date has not been confirmed, he said.

Adolfo, who is offering the theater to the students free of charge, said it was important to him to give the Tarleton students “a place that is safe and supportive” to present their work.

Adolfo summarized his reasons:

“This is about censorship,” he said. “I would show this support if it were any number of things. It’s not about gay, it’s not about religion. It’s about censorship.”

In a statement on the Rose Marie Theater website explains their position:

We support artistic freedom of expression and believe that students should be allowed to find and explore their artistic voice in a safe and nurturing environment.

The behavior by Texas state officials with regard to this matter has been spineless and despicable.  Given the successful track record of the play in other locations and the willingness of a private venue to host the performance clearly unmasks the  safety claim a transparent sham.   Texas has shown its absolute disregard for freedom of expression while encouraging bigotry and creating a patently hostile environment for ideas that challenge cultural intolerance.

Public reaction to Erykah Badu’s nude escapade

Tuesday, April 6th, 2010

The opinion blog on the Dallas Morning News website has some interesting reaction to Erykah Badu stripping off her clothes in Dealy Plaza in Dallas.

An innocent act of nudity

Nakedness is the default state of humanity and was perfectly acceptable in many societies throughout much of history. Children are not born with an inability to accept nudity and are not psychologically damaged by viewing it, as is demonstrated by many of the “uncivilized” cultures in which nakedness among both adults and children is common.

Contrary to popular belief, you do not have the right to never be offended. Being upset is not equal to demonstrable harm. The harm here is in a society that has stigmatized and shamed those who accept the human body as natural and who continue to brainwash others into torment over seeing it uncovered — which has led to the unreasonable possibility that people can be charged as sex offenders for an act that could be as innocent as skinny-dipping.


Jeremy Lyon, Mesquite

Nicely put, Jeremy.

Is govmt coming between you and your doctor?

Monday, April 5th, 2010

The answer is yes if you live in Alabama, Colorado, Georgia, Kansas, Louisiana, Mississippi, Texas or Virginia.

According to blackbookmag.com:

Manhattan’s East Side gynecologist, Dr. Scheinfeld, is the first American doctor to sell sex toys in his office.

Even aside from whether patients appreciate it, selling sex toys is illegal in the eight states listed.

I know what you were thinking when you saw the title of this post, though.  You probably thought I was going to talk about the federal ban on medical marijuana.  And, you’re absolutely right, of course.

Singer Erykah Badu charged for getting naked

Saturday, April 3rd, 2010

As I reported here on March 29th, singer Erykah Badu stripped naked in Dealy Plaza (where JFK was shot) while producing a video to go along with her song, “Window Seat”.

According to CNN:

A Dallas Police spokeswoman said earlier in the week that they wanted to press charges against Badu because children were present, but no one had called police or filed a complaint that day.

It’s gottta suck when the cops want to arrest someone and no one reports a crime.  Anyway, you won’t believe what happened next.  You guessed it.  Someone filed a complaint.  So a misdemeanor citation for disorderly conduct has been mailed to Badu who lives in Dallas.  Disorderly conduct is, of course, is what you charge someone with when they haven’t really committed a crime against someone, but you want to arrest them for something anyway.

“After much discussion, it has been determined that this charge best fits her conduct when she disrobed in a public place without disregard [sic] to other individuals and children who were in close proximity,” the police statement said. If convicted, Badu could be fined $500, police said.

How much discussion should it take to determine whether someone committed a crime?  Imagine that.  Being in a “state of nature” where other people could see her.  I’ll bet she raised an eyebrow for all of a minute or two before everyone went on with their lives like nothing every happened.

The idea that anyone suffers an identifiable injury from seeing someone else naked is so friggin’ over the top that it’s hard to imaging that the concept actually exists in an advanced civilized society.

More on the cancelation of “Corpus Christi”

Wednesday, March 31st, 2010

As I wrote yesterday, Texas Lt. Governor and Tarleton State University President condemned the stage performance of Corpus Christi ultimately leading to its cancellation.

The National Coalition Against Censorship issued a statement (pdf) about the treatment the play received at the hands of government and school officials.

The Catholic League has been in the business of attacking Corpus Christi since 1998 when the play premiered at The Manhattan Theater Club; threats of violence were also reported then, but the play was presented without incident. Corpus Christi has since been produced on college campuses many times without incident, even in the face of a lawsuit to halt production at Indiana University-Purdue University Fort Wayne and legislative threats to cut Florida Atlantic University’s funding. In these and other cases, the play was, correctly, allowed to go on. Tarleton State’s cancellation of the play stands in marked contrast, as an affront to our constitutional right to speak freely and to make our own decisions about the value of a painting, book, or play.

Meanwhile, Tarleton Police are investigating threats against those who planned to present the play.

Tarleton State University police will investigate some of the threatening e-mail messages and phone calls that prompted a drama professor to cancel a class in which students were to perform a controversial play that features a gay Jesus character, officials said Monday.

It’s a pretty sad state of affairs when a lieutenant governor, a university president, and a mob of Neanderthals treat the First Amendment as an affront to civilization.

“I believe in free speech, but…”

Tuesday, March 30th, 2010

Why do people always seem to preface a demand for censorship with words like that?

Texas Lt. Governor Dewhurst pressured students at Tarleton State University into canceling a performance of Corpus Christi.  Once cancelled, Dewhurst made this statement:

The cancellation of the play, Corpus Christi, by the university was the right thing to do. While I’m a strong defender of free speech, we must also protect the rights and reasonable expectations of Texas taxpayers and how their money is used. A play that is completely contrary to the standards of decency and moral beliefs of the vast majority of Texans should not be performed using any state resources, especially by an institution of higher learning.

It would appear from that statement that the First Amendment only applies to speech that Texans aren’t offended by.  Of course, the First Amendment isn’t there for the speech that people like.  It’s for the speech they don’t like.

Before the cancellation, University President F. Dominic Dottavio put out an amazingly pathetic self-serving editorial apologizing for being hogtied with the First Amendment:

My personal reaction is that I see no artistic or redeeming quality in the work. I believe, as many have opined, that it is offensive, crude and irreverent. It is my sense that there are significant numbers of faculty, staff and students at Tarleton who share my views of the play.

I am deeply saddened that so many people offended by the play believe that the university is endorsing it. We are not. I am hopeful that people will judge us against our 111-year history of providing exceptional educational opportunities for students rather than against this one unfortunate event.

It’s a sad day when a University President feels compelled to refer to the exercise of a First Amendment right as an “unfortunate event”.

The play was ultimately canceled by course lecturer and fine arts associate professor Mark Holtorf for ‘safety reasons’ leaving the score at Texas one, First Amendment zero.

Singer Erykah Badu strips naked in Dealey Plaza

Monday, March 29th, 2010

From CNN.com:

Erykah Badu shed her clothes as she walked along a Dallas, Texas, sidewalk until she was nude and then fell near where President Kennedy was assassinated.

The result was a controversial video, released Saturday, for her song “Window Seat,” which Badu said was “shot guerrilla style” with no crew and in one take March 17.

Badu was filming a video for her song, “Window Seat” to make a statement against group think.

She tweeted that “there were children there. i prayed they wouldnt b traumatized.”

Are children really “traumatized” by seeing a naked adult?  The answer is, of course, not by any stretch of the imagination.   Trauma is “an event outside normal human experience. Trauma leaves you feeling powerless, helpless, paralyzed and confused. Trauma is sudden and overwhelming.“  Seeing someone naked hardly falls outside the realm of normal human experience.

I don’t know if there is a version available without the pixelating of the ‘naughty’ parts.  Even the version on her website had the censorship, which seems a bit odd.  Censorship almost always eclipses any other message in an artistic work.

Badu tweeted that “i was petrified while shooting this video … but liberation began to set in. i conquered many fears in that few moments.”

She said she was “too busy lookin for cops” to be embarrassed by her nudity. “i been naked all along in my words actions and deeds. thats the real vulnerable place,” she tweeted.

The video does not include shouts from people off camera, she said. “they were yelling, ‘THIS IS A PUBLIC PLACE : YOU OUGHTA BE ASHAMED : PUT YOUR CLOTHES ON : DAMN GIRL! etc,” Badu tweeted.

What’s embarrassing isn’t the nudity.  It’s the absurd reaction to the nudity on the part of a public that does not tolerate even the simplest and most harmless of freedoms.

Porn made me do it!

Wednesday, March 24th, 2010

Sean Block was convicted of selling his girlfriend’s 5-year-old to a police informant.

From the San Antonio Current:

“My behavior started with — call it an addiction, call it a compulsion, I’m not sure, people call it different things — but an addiction to pornography.”

[...]

“And it was adult pornography that led me to many other things in my life — not even continuing my education after high school, because I tried,” he told the court. “I tried to go to college, and every night I was looking at pornography and not doing homework and then sleeping through class the next day. And it all started there.”

Yeah, yeah, yeah.  But what about the gazillion other people who view porn, manage to get an education, hold a job, and resist the urge to sell their friend’s kids to the first police informant who comes along with enough big enough offer?  Nope, I don’t think your problem is related to porn, Sean. Nice try, but no one is going to believe porn made you do it.

Well, no one except the anti-porn crusaders:

“The majority of porn that’s on the internet is violent and degrading,” said Mary Anne Layden, one of the principal authors of the report and co-director of the Sexual Trauma and Psychopathology Program at the University of Pennsylvania’s Center for Cognitive Therapy. Offering a graphic example to emphasize her point, Layden said the most rapidly increasing pornographic image online involves anal penetration followed by the man inserting his fecal-flecked penis into a woman’s mouth. “Violence is normalized, degrading is normalized, lack of intimacy is normalized, and the message also is that all men do this,” she said.

Wow!  That’s nasty.  But how does that fit into a discussion about whether porn causes crime?  The facts may even point the other way:

Academics are divided over what links, if any, exist between pornography and the development of violent sexual behavior. In recent years, the headlines have belonged to people like Anthony D’Amato, a widely published author and Leighton Professor of Law at Northwestern University School of Law. In a 2006 paper, D’Amato suggested that while “the American public is probably not ready to believe it,” porn may actually be reducing sexual violence. Culling rape statistics from the U.S. Department of Justice, the law-school prof reported a dramatic decline in rapes nationally since the release of Deep Throat on VHS in 1972 and the dawning of our new millennium, so marked by ubiquitous online X-rated videos, photos, and chatter. Reported rapes have dropped — from about 2.5 offenses per 1,000 people in 1980 to .4 per 1,000 almost a quarter-century later in 2004 — he wrote in his paper “Porn Up, Rape Down,” published by Northwestern as part of a research series in public law and legal theory.

The story continues with the anti-sex crusaders pulling out their trusty old tip-of-the-iceberg claim saying that rape only appears to be in decline because women aren’t reporting it as much anymore.

While woman will often claim they haven’t been raped, they will report they had sex after physical force or threats of physical harm. “You’ve got to use many more kinds of questions,” [Layden] said.

They never want to talk about all the people who manage to use porn without committing any sex crimes.  Or maybe she would claim that have committed rape, but they just haven’t been caught yet…

IRS suicide pilot’s wesbite snuffed at FBI request?

Sunday, February 21st, 2010

I’ve been wondering about this.  The reports I heard almost immediate after the news of the crash broke, was that the suicide note published on Stack’s site was no longer available because the government demanded that the webhost take it down.  Not only that, but there was apparently text in place on the site that spelled that out.

But now that’s not so clear.  The disclaimer at Stack’s website address doesn’t name the FBI anymore.  So what really happened? Pardon me if I’m not totally convinced by someone from the FBI simply saying something to the effect that “the FBI just doesn’t do stuff like that”.

In any case, the manifesto has been preserved on numerous sites as well as by the original web host.

Women having wilder sex, watching more porn

Saturday, February 20th, 2010

According to a survey of 4200 women, they are having sex less often, but getting crazier when they do have it.

But, even more interesting is this:

For instance, around 76 per cent of women now admit to using porn – a ten per cent rise on the two-thirds of girls who admitted to watching porn with their partners in a survey last year.

I’ll bet the anti-porn crusaders would be disappointed to hear that.  And given their contention that increased use of porn results in relationship problems, they might be even more disappointed to hear that just the opposite is happening:

Last year’s survey, by website Netmums, showed more than half weren’t happy in the bedroom, but this year more than 60 per cent claimed to enjoy fulfilling sex.

And finally:

More than half of the women surveyed used sex toys in the bedroom to add a buzz of excitement.

I wonder how many of those surveyed live in states stuck in the Dark Ages where sex toys are illegal (Alabama, Colorado, Georgia, Kansas, Louisiana, Mississippi, Texas and Virginia).