Archive for the ‘Iowa’ Category

Iowa dispenses with due process to save kids

Monday, February 14th, 2011

Iowa is no different from every other state that imagines child abuse everywhere they look.   Except Iowa is more innovative.  Given the popularity of sex offender registries throughout the country, Iowa has instituted a child abuse registry, but they decided this registry is too important to allow the courts to hinder it with inconvenient demands for due process:

It takes no conviction in court to end up on the registry – only a finding by Iowa Department of Human Services staff that it was “more likely than not” that the person neglected a child or, in a much smaller number of cases, abused a child.

Of course, state agencies, with their act first and ask questions later approach to child protection, have established reputation for harming children almost as bad as the accused child abusers themselves.  It’s no wonder that the credibility of the child abuse registry is being questioned:

Iowa’s 51,960-name child abuse registry could get an overhaul in the wake of complaints that the list damages reputations and job prospects for the accused before they’ve had a fair hearing.

“There are too many innocent people on that registry list,” said Rep. Bruce Hunter, D-Des Moines. “This isn’t about letting people guilty of child abuse off the hook. Those people shouldn’t be anywhere around children.”

So, Iowa DHS is willing to smear people without due process, effectively denying them employment in their career, and encouraging future persecution of them all in the name of protecting children?

Nice work Iowa.  How much longer before you start crucifying citizens on Main Street to set an example to others that, when it comes to protecting children, you are willing to destroy as many innocent people as it takes?

Oops! Minor typo.

Thursday, January 13th, 2011

Click on the image to see the fine print.

You people!

Wednesday, August 25th, 2010

Before I started this site, I wanted to start a blog called youpeople.org because, folks, there are times when you just want to grab the public by the shoulders and yell, “What’s wrong with You People?

While everyone has heard the phrase, ‘sex sells’, it would be a challenge to find anyone more dedicated to that philosophy for their own personal gain than politicians.  And way out ahead of the pack you will find prosecutors.

Nothing exemplifies that approach to self fulfillment quite like the parade of state attorneys general who have hitched their wagon to the moral crusade against craigslist.  As described on Huffington Post, seventeen state attorneys general have signed a letter (PDF) demanding that craigslist remove its adult services section.

“Only Craigslist has the power to stop these ads before they are even published,” Kansas attorney general Steve Six said in a statement.

Yes, that is absolutely correct.  That’s because the First Amendment prevents the government from doing it itself.  Unfortunately, being good students of the persuasion techniques practiced by organized crime, state governments are masters at intimidation when it looks like it could gain them some votes.

The campaign against craigslist didn’t start as a grass roots movement.  It started as a crusade by a noisy minority who are adept at stirring up public emotion with visions of children being exploited.

“No amount of money, however, can justify the scourge of illegal prostitution and the suffering of the women and children who will continue to be victimized, in the market and trafficking provided by Craigslist,” the letter said.

Women who advertise on criagslist are invariably described as idiots with no will of their own to resist exploitation by evil pimps and slave masters.  They have to be victims, otherwise who would get worked up about it?  And, of course, a lot of them have to be children for the same reason.

While wearing sheets is out of fashion, there should be no mistake that these state attorneys general are using persecution of a favorite target as a means to inflame the public’s mob mentality.  They might as well be carrying torches and pitchforks.  And the public, knowing that it would be impolite to demand actual numerical evidence that rises above the level of guesses and delusional claims, mindlessly goes along with the hysteria.  Who would oppose those whose only wish is to “help women and children”?  But, the last time I heard, a willingness to be your brother’s keeper wasn’t sufficient reason to burn the Constitution.

My message to the people of these states is this:

Well, folks, your wish is coming true.  In your fervor to impose your narrow personal values on everyone else, You People have created a monster who will enthusiastically piss on free speech in order to carry out your will.  But, be warned.  The monster is pretty kinky.  He likes a threesome, so don’t be surprised to find him in your bed as a supervising partner deciding what does or doesn’t constitute acceptable behavior between you and your lover.

P.S.  I intentionally avoided mention of Massachusetts Attorney General Martha Coakley simply because if I started writing about her, this post would have turned into a book.  She is probably one of the most self-serving and parasitic of politicians, having mastered the craft of exploiting children and sex hysteria for her own personal benefit.  In a contest to be the antichrist, Coakley would be a leading contender.

Bars to be held liable for nearby illegal activities?

Wednesday, March 3rd, 2010

From the Sioux City Journal website:

The Senate Commerce Committee agreed today to amend House File 788 to make bar and tavern owners responsible for illegal drug dealing, prostitution, brawls or other law-breaking activities that might occur on parking lots or other areas adjacent to the licensed premises.

Sounds like they want to turn bar owners into cops.  Of course, they could eliminate some of that crime problem with the stroke a of pen.  Prostitution, for example, could be taken off the street by legalizing it as a business  That would also drive a wedge between it and the illegal drug trade, something that anyone really interested in the welfare of women should be in favor of.

Defence attorney comments on Manga conviction

Wednesday, March 3rd, 2010

Last Month Iowa comic collector Christopher Handley was sentenced to 6 months in prison for possession of obscene Manga under paragraph 1466A of the federal criminal code.  Rather than being specific to photographic work, section 1466A includes a visual depiction of any kind, including a drawing, cartoon, sculpture, or painting“.

Manga is a kind of Japanese comic and Handley was a collector, but the obscene material was only a tiny part of his collection.

In a letter appearing on the Anime News Network website, Handley’s Attorney for that case, Eric Chase, answers some concerns expressed by the public about the case and how it was handled.  It is perhaps one of the clearest explanations of law regarding the criminalization of cartoon art I have yet seen.

Chase also explains how his case was handled in comparison to the 2008 Max Hardcore case (live action films which used adult women acting as children) and differentiates between the crimes of possession of and receiving obscenity.

Chase makes an interesting observation about obscenity law in the U.S.:

“Obscenity is the only law I’m aware of, if a client shows me a book or magazine or movie, and asks me if this image is illegal, I can’t tell them.”

The letter is worth reading in its entirety if you’re interested in the government’s crusade against child porn that doesn’t involve children.  Imagery that doesn’t harm anyone in its production has no business being outlawed, for doing so is punishing a person not for a criminal act, but for his fantasies.  In other words, the law, in effect, is targeting thought crime.

‘Obscene’ Manga Sentencing

Thursday, February 11th, 2010

In a case that drew national attention, Christopher Handley has been sentenced to six months in prison for his conviction on obscenity charges for his possession of sexual explicit Japanese Manga containing illustrations depicting children.

What makes this case stand out is that the pornography was not photographic, but comic book-like imagery not involving the actual use of any children.  This is yet another case that illustrates that his prosecution has nothing to do with protecting children, but is instead simply punishment for his interest in the material.  In other words, Handley was convicted of a thought crime.

On the bright side, Handley will not have to register as a sex offender, so I guess we should thank the court for their compassionate restraint in not totally destroying his life.

Catchy headline

Thursday, February 11th, 2010

Iowa mom accused of pimping daughter

It’s only after you start reading the story that it turns out that the daughter is 37 years old.  Not exactly a case of a mother selling her child as a sex slave.  Nonetheless, the headline is factual.  Of course, it would also have been factual if it read:

Undercover cops con mother into pimping daughter