Archive for the ‘Illinois’ Category

States back off on child child pornographers

Tuesday, February 8th, 2011

State obscenity laws that criminalize the sending of child porn by electronic means often don’t differentiate between children and adults.  A minor who sends a picture of herself to a boyfriend can be prosecuted under child porn laws.  Adults who send nude pictures of themselves to another adult are, of course, protected under the First Amendment.  Not so with minors who are not accorded those same free speech rights.

Texas is one such state trying to introduce a new perversion twist to this situation.  Rather than having to charge minors with a felony for sexting, they are considering a new option.  From Chron:

Instead of sending young people to jail for sexting, judges under Senate Bill 407 would be authorized to sentence minors — and one of the minor’s parents — to participate in an education program about sexting’s consequences.

Who better to train parents on how to raise their children than the state, right?  I guess, given the choice between spending the rest of your life as a registered sex offender or a re-education program, the latter option probably seems pretty attractive, although the kid is probably not entirely sold on the idea that he did anything wrong to begin with (precisely the kind of attitude that is remedied by a state re-education program).

The attorney general’s office quoted a 2008 report from the National Campaign to Prevent Teen and Unplanned Pregnancy indicating that 22 percent of teen girls said they have electronically sent or posted online nude or semi-nude images of themselves.

If you’re criminalizing an activity that almost a quarter of minors are guilty of, it’s only a matter of time before 60 Minutes does a segment about how your state is cranking out felon sex offenders by the boat  load.  Destroying kids’ lives is one thing, but embarrassing the state is another.

Of course, the concept of not prosecuting kids for non-crimes is not even on the radar of these morons.

Under current Texas law, minors charged with sexting face a third-degree felony, penalties of two to 10 years in prison, a fine up to $10,000 and lifelong registration as sex offenders.

Other states are addressing the same issue:

Watson’s bill is similar to recent legislation in Vermont, Illinois, Utah and Ohio that seeks to ease sexting penalties and prevent young people from getting caught up in the criminal system.

Back in April I posted about legislation in Arizona, North Carolina, Florida, and Virginia that provides for a lesser charges in the case of minors who send nude pictures of themselves to friends, thereby committing the terrible crime of child abuse where they are both the predator and the victim.  Sheesh!  Regardless of whether it’s a misdemeanor or a felony, it’s pretty clear that the real source of the abuse these kids face is at the hands of their own state governments.

Another sex crazed teacher story

Thursday, January 6th, 2011

A 27 tear old female dance teacher in Plainfield, Illinois is accused of having sex with her 16 year old student.

Ashley Blumenshine was arrested behind a department store in Plainfield, Illinois, after police caught her in a car with the teen.

Police believe that they had had sex shortly before the officers arrived.

The high school teacher is being held in custody charged with having sex with the student. Her attorney said she is innocent.

She taught dance and physical education at Plainfield North High School for four years and is known for her popularity. The boy is a junior at the school.

Assistant Will County State’s Attorney Mary Fillipitch said both occupants admitted they had just engaged in consensual sexual intercourse.

A condom was taken as evidence from the vehicle.

The following day, the Will County State’s Attorney’s office charged Blumenshine with aggravated criminal sexual abuse.

The article says the affair had been going on for about a month. The kid is 16.  The age of consent in Illinois is generally 17, but in this case it’s 18 since she is “a person of authority or trust” over him.   Of course, by the time he’s 18 he will become magically transformed from someone who is incapable of consenting to sex to someone who is actively encouraged by the government to become cannon fodder in some god forsaken desert on the other side of the planet.

I wonder what would have happened if they had both kept their mouths shut.  I hope the kid refuses to testify.  Without knowing anymore than what’s in the article, I would venture to say he has not been injured in the least by the affair but will suffer substantial guilt if they force him to assist in destroying this teacher’s life.  I would probably regret it for the rest of my life.  Unfortunately, kids are steeped in the propaganda of sex hysteria and the idea that cops and prosecutors are always the good guys.

Are those hookers or just cops?

Wednesday, September 1st, 2010

Cook County, IL is aggressively targeting those who use prostitutes by posing as hookers to trick them into committing a crime.  Of course, it’s not trickery when cops do it.

Cook county Sheriff Thomas J. Dart unveiled two new billboards on Mannheim Road near O’Hare Sunday, the Sun-Times reports.

The latest tool in the sheriff’s fight to stop prostitution read: “Chances are, the woman you are about to pick up works for us.
Expect to pay $2,150” and “Dear John, if you’re here to solicit sex, it could cost you $2,150. We’re teaming up to bust you.”

Cool.  Now when you drive by someone you think might be a hooker on the street, you can point her out to the kids.  “Look kids!  A cop.”  Who knows, that knowledge could be helpful someday when your kid needs a cop.  Who says they’re never around when you need one?  You just need to know what they look like.

Of course, the big shift from arresting prostitutes to arresting their customers is largely the feminist contribution to the war on prostitution.  It’s difficult to claim to be campaigning for women’s rights when when you’re actively supporting the criminalization of what many women do as a profession.  To the feminist mind, women’s movement is less about freedom and more about targeting men as exploitative, as if women are mindless putty in their hands (a stunningly insulting position on its face).

The money collected from the fines is given to the Department of Women’s Justice Services.  There’s nothing unjust about that since, as everyone knows, if it weren’t for men wanting sex, women wouldn’t be pressured into selling it to them.  You know, the same way rock stars are shamefully exploited by those who have a desire for rock music.

“This is not just a one-time sweep,” Dart told the paper.  “We’re waging a war on prostitution and want to make it incredibly difficult for every aspect of it to operate here.

Well, at least he’s honest.  What could be more effective in fighting crime than waging a war on consenting adults  who simply wish to have sex on terms they both agree to?

You people!

Wednesday, August 25th, 2010

Before I started this site, I wanted to start a blog called youpeople.org because, folks, there are times when you just want to grab the public by the shoulders and yell, “What’s wrong with You People?

While everyone has heard the phrase, ‘sex sells’, it would be a challenge to find anyone more dedicated to that philosophy for their own personal gain than politicians.  And way out ahead of the pack you will find prosecutors.

Nothing exemplifies that approach to self fulfillment quite like the parade of state attorneys general who have hitched their wagon to the moral crusade against craigslist.  As described on Huffington Post, seventeen state attorneys general have signed a letter (PDF) demanding that craigslist remove its adult services section.

“Only Craigslist has the power to stop these ads before they are even published,” Kansas attorney general Steve Six said in a statement.

Yes, that is absolutely correct.  That’s because the First Amendment prevents the government from doing it itself.  Unfortunately, being good students of the persuasion techniques practiced by organized crime, state governments are masters at intimidation when it looks like it could gain them some votes.

The campaign against craigslist didn’t start as a grass roots movement.  It started as a crusade by a noisy minority who are adept at stirring up public emotion with visions of children being exploited.

“No amount of money, however, can justify the scourge of illegal prostitution and the suffering of the women and children who will continue to be victimized, in the market and trafficking provided by Craigslist,” the letter said.

Women who advertise on criagslist are invariably described as idiots with no will of their own to resist exploitation by evil pimps and slave masters.  They have to be victims, otherwise who would get worked up about it?  And, of course, a lot of them have to be children for the same reason.

While wearing sheets is out of fashion, there should be no mistake that these state attorneys general are using persecution of a favorite target as a means to inflame the public’s mob mentality.  They might as well be carrying torches and pitchforks.  And the public, knowing that it would be impolite to demand actual numerical evidence that rises above the level of guesses and delusional claims, mindlessly goes along with the hysteria.  Who would oppose those whose only wish is to “help women and children”?  But, the last time I heard, a willingness to be your brother’s keeper wasn’t sufficient reason to burn the Constitution.

My message to the people of these states is this:

Well, folks, your wish is coming true.  In your fervor to impose your narrow personal values on everyone else, You People have created a monster who will enthusiastically piss on free speech in order to carry out your will.  But, be warned.  The monster is pretty kinky.  He likes a threesome, so don’t be surprised to find him in your bed as a supervising partner deciding what does or doesn’t constitute acceptable behavior between you and your lover.

P.S.  I intentionally avoided mention of Massachusetts Attorney General Martha Coakley simply because if I started writing about her, this post would have turned into a book.  She is probably one of the most self-serving and parasitic of politicians, having mastered the craft of exploiting children and sex hysteria for her own personal benefit.  In a contest to be the antichrist, Coakley would be a leading contender.

Soldier in Afghanistan charged with child porn after receiving pictures of 4 y/o niece from home

Monday, January 18th, 2010

I wish I could say I was skeptical that a few pictures sent from home could earn this guy child porn charges, but rationality rarely plays much of a role in child porn cases.

Spec. Billy Miller, 24, was due to return from Afghanistan last September, but his tour of duty has been involuntarily extended while he awaits a court martial on charges of failing to obey a general order and possession of child pornography.

We’ll have to see where this goes.  It could be a “zero tolerance” rule where everyone gets really stupid under the motto of “erring on the side of caution when children are involved” or the guy had other pictures on his computer.