Archive for the ‘District of Columbia’ Category

Smithsonian censors gay art exhibit

Wednesday, January 12th, 2011

The National Portrait Gallery in Washington, DC sponsored a an art exhibit called “Hide/Seek: Difference and Desire in American Portraiture,”  which focused on gay artists of the past century.  Things went well for a while, but then…

From HuffPo:

Nearly six weeks into the show’s run, some members of Congress led by GOP Leader Congressman John Boehner, encouraged by the ire and financial backing of certain religious zealots, decided that one work, in particular, must be removed from the exhibit, David Wojnarowicz’s A Fire in My Belly. Without even a moment of public discourse, the Smithsonian team ‘stepped and fetched.’

As in every case of art, he who pays the piper, calls the tune.  When the artists rely on government handouts, they shouldn’t be surprised when government officials impose restrictions as demanded by favored interest groups, in this case Catholic League president William Donohue, who dubbed the video “hate speech”.  Hate speech is, of course, a term used to summarily dismiss expression in a way that discourages debate.  After all, who could possibly support hate speech.

The arts could survive just fine without government financial support and if some work needs government support to exist, then I question its value and why I should be forced, through my taxes, to subsidize something that no one else cares about or likes.

Another problem with government support of the arts is that the government  becomes the arbiter of what constitutes legitimate art.   Artists then tend to tailor their work so as to not be excluded.  In that way the government suppresses what it doesn’t like and encourages artists to express what is politically acceptable.

It’s a disgrace that Congress would fund a museum that excludes First Amendment protection.  If they want to be in the museum business, they should perhaps consider incorporating a higher level of integrity into that endeavor than they are used to with everything else they do.  A lot higher.

Obama = Keynesian?

Wednesday, November 3rd, 2010

A little comic relief for those who think that dumb asses are always conservatives.

This actually restored my faith in democracy!  hahaha!  Just kidding.

Admittedly, I’m pretty old, so I had the benefit of being in high school back when they still taught economics, otherwise I could have easily been one of the idiots in this video.

Arrested because you might possibly maybe be thinking of committing a victimless crime

Tuesday, August 31st, 2010

The Crime Report has an interesting story about New York’s law against “loitering for the purpose of engaging in a prostitution offense”.

And that was pretty much it. The officer didn’t hear her say anything; nor did he ask any of the men he saw her talking to what she had said. That didn’t faze the assistant district attorney, who attempted to get condoms found in the defendant’s purse admitted as evidence.

Of course, prostitution has migrated from the street to the internet:

Before the Internet, vice cops had it relatively easy. Most cities had specific areas known for street prostitution where undercover officers posing as johns could chat up a lady, strike a deal to pay for a sex act, and then pull out the cuffs. But in the last decade, the oldest profession has “gone high-tech,” says Jaime Ayala, Deputy Chief of Police in Arlington, Texas.

Gee, one would think that getting it off the street would be a good thing…

And then there’s the obligatory reference to Craig’s List.  Of course, no one really knows how many women and children are actually victimized by Craig’s List, but you can be certain it’s “a lot”.

Anyone who has perused the adult sections of Craigslist or Backpage knows that men and women (and boys and girls) advertise their sexual services online. What this means for police is a lot more legwork. At the same time, a rise in awareness about the ugly world of human trafficking, where women from abroad—and, in some cases, American children—are held hostage in brothels disguised as massage parlors, has shifted law enforcement focus and resources away from traditional vice work, according to many attorneys.

These days, most vice work is simply tricking someone into committing a “crime”.   Pardon my skepticism that the internet makes it more difficult for cops to arrest prostitutes.  If anything, it makes it easy to set up a sting without even having to leave the office until you’re ready to spring the trap.

The Prostitution Free Zone is a novel idea that codifies the crime of “being in the wrong place at the wrong time” by permitting cops to arrest anyone with a prior record of prostitution who happen to be in the PFZ.

Washington, D.C. also created PFZs in 2006.  But, according to Professor John Copacino of the Georgetown University Criminal Justice Clinic, the district “gets around the constitutionality” by making the zones temporary: they can be in effect for just 10 days at a time. Portions of the district’s downtown area were declared PFZs during the inauguration of Barack Obama in January 2009.

I guess it’s ok to suspend people’s Constitutional rights if it’s only in ten day chunks.  And then there are the folks who just want to get laid without having to ante up the cash:

Georgetown’s Copacino also sees problems. Standing around, even propositioning potential (non-paying) sexual partners while wearing a short skirt and stilettos, is not illegal. “You can’t criminalize normal behavior, ” says Copacino.

It gets worse:

The problem, says [Portland defense attorney Elizabeth Wakefield], is that the city is now issuing many of these charges as violations rather than crimes, which under Oregon law means that the defendants don’t qualify for court-appointed counsel who could encourage them to challenge the arrest.

Poor people = fair game.

Stagliano Obscenity Charges Dismissed!

Friday, July 16th, 2010

Federal charges against porn producer John Stagliano were summarily dismissed by Judge Richard Leon today almost immediately after the prosecution rested.  The trial is the culmination of a crusade against Stagliano by federal anti-sex zealots for years.   In case you don’t know who John Stagliano is, I blogged about him here.

According to Washington City Paper:

After a series of fuck-ups by the United States Government, the obscenity trial against John “Buttman” Stagliano in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia has been dismissed. Around 4:30 p.m. this afternoon, Judge Richard Leon decided that the prosecution’s case against Stagliano—and two related corporations, John Stagliano Inc. and Evil Angel Productions, Inc.—was “woefully lacking.”

A great way to end the week.  Of course, while Stagliano won, being the target of a federal morality crusade probably left his pocketbook considerably lighter.  And you can be sure that there will be no repercussions for the bumbling  prosecutors.  Cases like this are career builders, and the bodies they leave in their wake are just part of the collateral damage they leave in their wake.

20 years ago in Cincinnati…

Thursday, April 8th, 2010

On April 7th, 1990, cops walked into the Contemporary Arts Center and presented indictments against an exhibit of works entitled “Perfect Moment” by photographer, Robert Mapplethorpe who had recently died of complications from AIDS.  Ultimately the exhibit went on and the events were later portrayed in a Showtime made-for-TV movie called “Dirty Pictures“.

Mapplethorpe’s graphic images of raw explicit gay sexuality made headlines repeatedly.  In fact, in 1989, when Mapplethorpe was invited to exhibit his work at the privately owned Corcoran Gallery in Washington DC, the museum refused to permit the “Perfect Moment” collection to be shown.  the exhibit went on to be shown successfully at the Washington Project for the Arts to large crowds.

The movie, “Dirty Pictures”, stars James Woods as the Cincinnati Arts Center curator and is available in DVD format on Netflix.  I have not seen it yet, but have added it to my Netflix queue.  I will try to remember to post a review after I’ve seen it.

Cops confiscate condoms from prostitutes

Friday, March 19th, 2010

Ms. Magazine discusses the stunningly moronic practice of confiscating condoms of suspected sex workers by cops in New York, Washington, DC, and San Francisco

Keeping a few condoms tucked in your handbag probably won’t land you behind bars—unless police profile you as a possible sex worker. Are you in an area known for street prostitution? Are you a transgender woman? Are you a woman of color? Do you have a prior record? If you answer yes to any of these questions, the number of condoms you’re carrying could suddenly become grounds for suspicion, even if you are not engaging in illegal activity.

Discouraging condom use among prostitutes ranks right up there with “fucking for virginity” in terms of sheer stupidity.  Not that cops are likely to be too concerned about the safety of anyone engaging in an illegal vice.

Instead of stigmatizing condom use, law enforcement should be promoting it, especially among high-risk groups such as sex workers. “Sex workers are safe-sex educators,” says Kimberlee Cline, a San Francisco-based escort. “Not only do we teach people how to use condoms, we teach people how to enjoy sex while wearing a condom. It’s really important for us to be recognized
as part of the solution.”

It should be pointed out that New York was also one of the slowest states to permit over-the-counter sale of hypodermic needles, condemning IV drug users to a significantly higher incidence of AIDS for years.  Not exactly a glowing recommendation when it comes to moral standards by most definitions.

Saturday Links

Saturday, January 9th, 2010
  • Don’t forget, tomorrow (Jan. 10th) is No Pants Subway Day.  According to Carnal Nation, “Last year’s trouser-eschewing event took place on New York’s MTA, with 1,200 casually pantsless, plus 22 other cities, including Warsaw, Adelaide and Amsterdam.”
  • Canada joins Britain in it’s concern that airport body scans on children constitute child porn.
  • A new nonprofit Center for Sexual Pleasure and Health in Pawtucket, RI, is under attack by a leading anti-prostitution and anti-sex trafficking advocate.  Oddly, a more traditional adult business would probably face fewer obstacles.