The National Portrait Gallery in Washington, DC sponsored a an art exhibit called “Hide/Seek: Difference and Desire in American Portraiture,” which focused on gay artists of the past century. Things went well for a while, but then…
From HuffPo:
Nearly six weeks into the show’s run, some members of Congress led by GOP Leader Congressman John Boehner, encouraged by the ire and financial backing of certain religious zealots, decided that one work, in particular, must be removed from the exhibit, David Wojnarowicz’s A Fire in My Belly. Without even a moment of public discourse, the Smithsonian team ‘stepped and fetched.’
As in every case of art, he who pays the piper, calls the tune. When the artists rely on government handouts, they shouldn’t be surprised when government officials impose restrictions as demanded by favored interest groups, in this case Catholic League president William Donohue, who dubbed the video “hate speech”. Hate speech is, of course, a term used to summarily dismiss expression in a way that discourages debate. After all, who could possibly support hate speech.
The arts could survive just fine without government financial support and if some work needs government support to exist, then I question its value and why I should be forced, through my taxes, to subsidize something that no one else cares about or likes.
Another problem with government support of the arts is that the government becomes the arbiter of what constitutes legitimate art. Artists then tend to tailor their work so as to not be excluded. In that way the government suppresses what it doesn’t like and encourages artists to express what is politically acceptable.
It’s a disgrace that Congress would fund a museum that excludes First Amendment protection. If they want to be in the museum business, they should perhaps consider incorporating a higher level of integrity into that endeavor than they are used to with everything else they do. A lot higher.
