Archive for the ‘Colorado’ Category

Is Judd manipulating the law for fame and glory?

Sunday, December 26th, 2010

If you’ve been keeping up with this story, you know that Polk County, Florida, Sheriff Grady Judd had Colorado resident, Phillip Greaves, arrested last Monday for mailing a book called “The Pedophile’s Guide to Love and Pleasure: A Child-Lover’s Code of Conduct” to Florida cops.

It should be noted that Greaves is not accused of pedophilia or any other act of injuring a child.  He simply wrote a book that discussed the topic.

And the man who had him arrested?  Well here is what Sheriff Judd says about the case:

“This has nothing to do with free speech and everything to do with obscenity,” Judd said. “We had a law in Florida that applied. We only needed jurisdiction.”

So, not only is Sheriff Judd completely ignorant of the historical conflict between obscenity laws and free speech, he sees absolutely nothing wrong with enforcing Florida state laws on Colorado residents.

When it comes to egotistical idiocy, Judd is clearly off the charts.  And, of course, who pays for that idiocy?  Well, certainly not the idiot.  Nope.  Phillip Greaves must sit in jail waiting for court system to throw out the charges, which is a near inevitability.  But  Judd will be a hero because there is no such thing as being too hard on anyone accused of a crime against children.  Innocence or guilt does not factor into the lynch mob mentality which is the force that modulates the public in cases like this.

Finally, as reported in AVN, in order to extradite Greaves, it was necessary to charge him with a felony, but his book apparently doesn’t violate any of the felony provisions of the law under which he was charged.  In order to rise to the level of a felony, the book would have to include pictures of actual children.

This apparent manipulation by Florida law enforcement of its own statutes could undermine the case and lead to even bigger headaches for the County.

Judd in his rush to exploit the sensational story to his own ends might wind up being sued (which really only penalizes the taxpayers).

The story, said Walters, was a national one even before Judd stuck his nose into it, which he probably did for the very fact that it was national. But the national appeal of such a case could also provide Greaves with a legal defense team that he could never in his life afford. He will probably be forced to use a public defender at first, said Walters, but soon, he expects to see a team of top drawer First Amendment lawyers descend upon the state and offer Greaves their services.

As is often the case, the porn industry is at the forefront of the fight to defend the First Amendment from those who would gladly trample it to satisfy their own narrow moral or political agenda.

In the end, as I have often written, the First Amendment contains no exceptions for obscenity.  The Supreme Court pulled obscenity exemption out of its collective ass.  It’s like saying that the First Amendment protects free speech unless its really offensive to enough people, in which case we will pretend there is no First Amendment.  The fact is, of course, the First Amendment is designed specifically to protect offensive speech.

Sex toy freedom fighter opens new store

Wednesday, November 10th, 2010

Sherri Williams, owner of two Alabama adult stores is opening a third store in a Huntsville building formerly used by a bank which gives the new store the novelty of having a drive-up window similar to neighboring fast food outlets.

Sherri Williams is known for waging a long court battle to get Alabama’s sex toy ban overturned.  The sex toy ban was introduced by State Senator Tom Butler (see the Sex Hysteria Hall of Shame), sailing through the sexually repressed state legislature with virtually no opposition.  Sherri Williams assisted by the ACLU sued to have the law overturned, taking her fight all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court.  Needless to say, the law withstood the challenge.

It should be noted that Senator Bulter, who has served in the Alabama legislature since 1982, was roundly trounced by Republican Bill Holtzclaw in the 2010 elections.  Whether Holtzclaw is any better remains to be seen, but it’s a certainty that Alabama will continue to defend its reputation for being among the most sexually repressed populations in the country (and probably the world).

To be fair to other states that proudly take repression seriously, it should be pointed out that Colorado, Georgia, Kansas, Louisiana, Mississippi, Texas and Virginia also have criminal statutes targeting sex toys.

Is govmt coming between you and your doctor?

Monday, April 5th, 2010

The answer is yes if you live in Alabama, Colorado, Georgia, Kansas, Louisiana, Mississippi, Texas or Virginia.

According to blackbookmag.com:

Manhattan’s East Side gynecologist, Dr. Scheinfeld, is the first American doctor to sell sex toys in his office.

Even aside from whether patients appreciate it, selling sex toys is illegal in the eight states listed.

I know what you were thinking when you saw the title of this post, though.  You probably thought I was going to talk about the federal ban on medical marijuana.  And, you’re absolutely right, of course.

Speaking of “Avenue Q”…

Thursday, February 25th, 2010
Lucy the Slut

Lucy the Slut

…billboard company, Lamar, has refused to put up a billboard in Colorado Springs because it includes a puppet, Lucy the Slut, from the popular adult Broadway musical, “Avenue Q“.

An account executive with Lamar told the Colorado Springs Gazette newspaper that old and young people in the Mayberry-esque paradise simply wouldn’t understand why Lucy is so trampish — soooooo going-to-hell-in-a-handbasket-ish: “If I have to explain it to my 4-year-old or my grandmother, we don’t put it up.”

You know, Small Town America, just isn’t ready for ideas that challenge the confines of their little conservative narrow-minded bubble.

Of course, Lamar, as a private company is, and should be, free to pick and choose what they put on their signs.    The issue at hand is that the company would expect to get more crap from the sex-paranoid community for not shielding them from mildly controversial content than they will get by refusing to put the sign up.

In any case, the commentary is pretty funny and does express some outrage for Lamar’s four year old intelligence ceiling.

Boulder worried they violated First Amendment

Wednesday, February 24th, 2010

According to thedenverchannel.com:

Some Boulder City Council members are reportedly concerned they may have violated a resident’s First Amendment rights after they had him arrested during a council meeting last week.

[...]

When Seth Brigham silently protested a proposal to criminalize nudity by stripping down to his boxers in last week’s city council meeting, he wasn’t breaking any Boulder laws.

Of course the city is looking to cover its ass after the fact…

“He was not specifically arrested for his comments. He was arrested because he was asked to leave and he refused to obey the order of an officer,” said von Keyserling [a City of Boulder spokesman].

And why was he asked to leave, Mr. von Keyserling?

I’ve heard that nudity as part of a protest is a protected speech.   I hope Seth Brigham cleans their clock.  Unfortunately any costs would not be borne by the city council or the cops, but would land squarely on the backs of the taxpayers (who will most likely reelect the same council members at the next election).

Man wins $4.1 million for wrongful imprisonment

Tuesday, February 16th, 2010

Tim Masters was 15 when 37-year-old Peggy Hettrick, was found murdered and sexually mutilated in a field near Masters’ family home.

Twelve years later, in 1999…

He was convicted largely on circumstantial evidence and the testimony of an expert witness who said he fit the profile of a sexual predator.

Nothing like throwing that little prejudice into the case to get jury to see the accused as something akin to the Antichrist.

Citing DNA evidence that did not implicate Masters, a visiting judge threw out the case in 2008, and Masters walked free.

The crime remains unsolved.

More lawsuits are in the works.

An earlier report from when Masters was released says one cop as well as two prosecutors (both now judges) involved with the Hettrick case are being investigated.

The link for this story was pulled from a comment by Michael Chaney over at theagitator.com.

Boulder, CO may ban nudity

Wednesday, February 3rd, 2010

This headline is a little deceptive:

Boulder to consider public-nudity law making toplessness illegal: Ordinance would lessen penalties for streaking and taking part in Naked Bike Ride

Passing a local ordinance does not eliminate the state law which makes streakers into registered sex offenders.  It simply allows the city police the option of charging someone under a lesser crime, although I would argue that a thouosand dollar fine and 90 days in jail is not exactly a slap on the wrist.

Of course, the idea of criminalizing nudity shows how willing society is to outlaw any activity they don’t like, regardless of whether it actually causes any harm.  Laws against nudity are a dress code no less than a mandate that women wear burqas.

How generous of them to permit you to be naked in your own home, as long as no one can see you from outside.

I’m sure the world will be a safer place knowing that the menace of streaking has finally been eradicated.   Such crimes are a social problem at least of the same magnitude as pasting  Jesus Loves You bumper stickers all over the back of your car.

Streakers on the Sex Offender Registry?

Saturday, January 16th, 2010

Yep.  In Colorado, if you’re caught streaking (a misdemeanor), you could wind up having to register as a sex offender, but the Boulder DA wants to change that.  While the idea that simple nudity makes anyone dangerous is ridiculous to most citizens, it is by no means a foregone conclusion that any given legislative body would be aware of that.