Archive for the ‘California’ Category

Hookers are “a valuable crime fighting tool”

Thursday, January 13th, 2011

A story on Fox40 out of Sacramento talks about the booming sex industry in Modesto even though the cops recently conducted a sting that resulted in two dozen men being arrested for the very serious crime of wanting to have an orgasm (with someone besides themselves).

The story makes the point that the motels where these prostitutes work don’t seem to mind the business they’re in.

A 22 year old prostitute named Candy told FOX40’s John Lobertini, there’s an unspoken rule: DON’T ASK, DON’T TELL.  “Are you ever question about what you do by these motel operators?” Lobertini asked.  “No, No.  The only interaction we ever have with them is to go pay for our room,” Candy says.  “They don’t ask because they don’t want to know?” Lobertini quizzed.  “Yes, pretty much,” she says.

Of course, by the standards of the rescue groups, those motels are exploiting those poor women.   Better that the women should be forced to work in dark allies or in the back of a beat up old Buick.

But what really grabbed my attention was this:

Prostitution is a victimless crime; the charges and fines are often minor.  “What are you doing tonight,”  but what these women see from the men they meet behind closed doors can be revealing.  And, strangely enough the prostitutes become valuable crime fighting tools.  ”They’ll get the license plate on these individuals.

And, when we end up running them we come to find out their sexual predators, violent sexual offenders and they’re not supposed to be around any of this,” says Deputy Marc Nuno during a brief break from patrol.

There’s not much substance there, but it sounds like the hookers are actually helping the cops to get violent johns off the street.  Or it could just be something the cop made up to justify why they’re seen taking their breaks around hookers so often…

Civil commitment, California style

Monday, January 3rd, 2011

Sex Hysteria reader, Richard, posted a link to a youtube documentary in the comments under a post I did several days ago about civil commitment.

I was pretty busy over the holidays with out-of-town family visitors staying with us, but I finally manged to catch up and view this documentary about California’s Coalinga “mental hospital” where they house convicted sex offenders who have served their time, but remain incarcerated under civil commitment procedures.  I must say, this documentary is well worth watching.    To quote my own comment after seeing it:

On the one hand, there are those in the treatment program who willing to say and do anything the staff wants them to in hopes that they will be one of the very few who eventually gain their freedom. On the other hand, there are the 70% those who refuse treatment and are warehoused with no hope of being released except through the courts. It’s the classic authoritarian witch hunt mentality. By denying that they are a danger to society, they are confirming that they are indeed danger to society and must remain incarcerated.

The entire documentary is pretty sickening, reminiscent of the re-education of Winston Smith in Nineteen Eighty-Four or the behavioral modification of Alex in A Clockwork Orange.

I highly recommend visiting youtube to watch all six parts (totally about 1 hour).

The newest rescue industry start-up?

Tuesday, September 21st, 2010

The San Diego based non-profit “With More Than Purpose” seems to be the latest entry into the online trafficking moral panic.  Hardly a week goes by without some new organization sprouting up to ride this wave, but this one seems to be leading the charge in terms of terrible website design.

And, of course, they seem to be spewing forth the same delusional propaganda and, like clock work, the press mindlessly repeats it.

Sex trafficking is a $19-billion industry. Nationally, San Diego is the eighth largest high-intensity child prostitution area according to the inspector general. Nikki Junker, who is with the organization With More Than Purpose, says the public knows little about child prostitution. With More Than Purpose advocates for victims of child prostitution.

“It’s modern-day slavery, I think is the best way to put it,” Junker said. “There’s 100,000 children this year which will be commercially, sexually exploited.”

And, as if that weren’t enough, this one has taken the lead in the ridiculous claims competition.

Junker says the average age of entry into prostitution in the United States is 12.

Most groups seem to stick to the 13-14 age range.  But, I’m sure if we wait a few weeks, it will probably be lower.

With names like A Future, Not a Past and With More Than Purpose, you have to wonder if these outfits are all franchises of some central organization with way too much time on their hands.

Adult businesses face regulation hell

Monday, August 9th, 2010

After posting about the a ridiculous West Virginia ordinance controlling adult stores, I did a search for other similar cases.  If it were any other kind of business, the public wouldn’t stand for the kind of harassment that cities level at adult businesses.  But, sex related businesses are fair game and people either don’t care or don’t want to stand up to crusaders who claim to be “protecting children”.

Nothing like being kicked when you’re down. The VIP Bookstore in Calexico City, California collapsed during a 7.2 magnitude earthquake in April and the city is preventing it from reopening while it cooks up new regulations to restrict the operations of adult businesses.

Don’t be usin’ our roads to get to yer sex stores! Rensselaer, NY is complaining about a law passed in nearby E.Greenbush restricting the location of adult businesses because people would, you know, have to drive on their roads to get to the area.  Says Rensselaer Mayor Mark Pratt:

“If people have to drive through the city to get to these [sex] shops, it’s obviously not something we would want to see,”

Complaints during the comment period complained that:

Under this law, locker rooms at health clubs could be eliminated because there is nudity there,” said a man identified only as Phil. “Women would not be able to wear bikinis at pools, because they would be semi-nude.”
The man said the law would also infringe on the arts in the event nude models were used, as well as on the theatre.

The law is “designed to balance First Amendment rights with the rights of other citizens”.  Huh?  Is that like trying to balance people’s First Amendment rights against those who don’t think there should be First Amendment rights.

You can’t make this shit up. In Gastonia, NC adult merchants are prohibited from having “two sexually oriented uses under one roof”.

A pair of adult businesses in Gastonia have been cited by the city for both showing sexually explicit movies and selling explicit videos and DVDs — a combination that violates state and local laws.

God wouldn’t approve! A church group is fighting an already approved adult business in Southington, Connecticut.   While a challenge to the approval of the VIP (Very Intimate Pleasures) store was mysteriously dropped at the last minute, the towns folk will have another opportunity to get out their pitch forks and torches in October:

The next chance for public comment on the VIP approval will be Oct. 6, when the Planning and Zoning Commission will hold a public hearing on a moratorium on adult-oriented businesses.

The above are only a sampling of stories about the legal challenges aimed at adult oriented businesses happening over the last week.  One can only wonder why anyone would want to get into the business knowing the persecution they can expect from intolerant residents who are all for freedom (except when they aren’t).

Gay Marriage and Equal Rights

Thursday, August 5th, 2010

Yesterday a U.S. District Court in San Francisco threw out California’s ban on gay marriage, known as Proposition 8.

From L.A. Now:

U.S. District Chief Judge Vaughn R. Walker said Proposition 8, passed by voters in November 2008, violated the federal constitutional rights of gays and lesbians to marry the partners of their choice. His ruling is expected to be appealed to the U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals and then up to the U.S. Supreme Court.

Vaughn added: “Plaintiffs seek to have the state recognize their committed relationships, and plaintiffs’ relationships are consistent with the core of the history, tradition and practice of marriage in the United States.“

Ultimately, the judge concluded that Proposition 8 “fails to advance any rational basis in singling out gay men and lesbians for denial of a marriage license. Indeed, the evidence shows Proposition 8 does nothing more than enshrine in the California Constitution the notion that opposite-sex couples are superior to same-sex couples. … Because Proposition 8 prevents California from fulfilling its constitutional obligation to provide marriages on an equal basis, the court concludes that Proposition 8 is unconstitutional.”]

Another web site, American Foundation for Equal Rights, proclaims, “We won!

From the very beginning, this issue has been framed by the media and interest groups as having two, and only two, sides.  One side promotes the idea that marriage is traditionally defined as heterosexual and plays a special role in the survival of the species.  The other side believes that gay couples deserve the same recognition and benefits that heterosexual couples get.  Both positions are narrow-minded and self serving.

In a civilization that values freedom, there is no role for government in deciding who can associate with whom or the terms of those associations.   The third side of this issue is that government should get the fuck out of the marriage business completely, but in a factionalized society that has come to view government as an indispensable god-like partner for enforcing a preferred version of social conformity, that position doesn’t usually warrant mention.

So, the American Foundation for Equal Rights really isn’t promoting equal rights at all.  They simply want the right to join an exclusive club so they can reap the  special privileges that they aren’t entitled to as non-members.  If they really advocated equal rights, they would be denouncing the special privileges granted to one class of people (married) and denied to another (single).

The bottom line is that homosexual and heterosexual individuals should both enjoy the same rights whether they are married or not.

Deep Throat on Broadway and Hollywood

Wednesday, July 28th, 2010

The story surrounding the 1972 porn production of Deep Throat is slated to open on Broadway in September.

From the New York Press:

David Bertolino’s The Deep Throat Sex Scandal is a behind-the-scenes look at the chaos that surrounded Gerard Damiano’s 1972 film, a project that brought pornography to the mainstream and endured several obscenity trials before developing a cultish following that exists to this day.


From the official website for the play:

In 1972, a hairdresser from Queens made a little movie that grossed over 600 million dollars and ignited the sexual revolution.

THE DEEP THROAT SEX SCANDAL takes you into the secret world of adult film making and introduces you to the legendary Linda Lovelace and Harry Reems.

Follow the bizarre journey from the creation of the movie, through the raids, arrests and the banning of the film, to the political fallout of the ensuing courtroom drama.

If  you watch the news at all, you’re already aware that a movie is also in the works to tell the story of Deep Throat star Linda Lovelace. The movie, directed by Matthew Wilder and entitled Inferno: A Linda Lovelace Story will star Lindsey Lohan in the lead role.

Instead of focusing on the political and social ramifications of Deep Throat, this is a biographical drama centering on the story of the star herself who, after the low budget porn movie became a success, claimed that she had been forced into the role by her controlling husband.  She subsequently separated from him and became an anti-porn activist.  Linda Lovelace, born Linda Boreman died in 2002, but the movie she starred in is an icon of the adult film industry holding the record for the most successful porn film ever produced.  If Inferno goes forward, it’s schedeuled for release in 2011.

NYT editoral on SCOTUS and violent video games

Thursday, May 6th, 2010

The Supreme Court recently agreed to hear a case challenging California’s ban on the sale of violent video games to children under 18.  The Ninth Circuit has already ruled against the law.

From the New York Times editorial:

California’s law imposes fines of up to $1,000 on retailers that sell violent video games to anyone under 18. To qualify, a game must, as a whole, lack serious literary artistic, political or scientific value for minors.

Ever since the Miller Test (and probably long before), governments, both state and federal, seem to think it’s possible to distill an objective determination out of a subjective opinion.  Whether a game (or any other expression) constitutes “serious literary artistic, political or scientific value” is not something that anyone can know in advance.  Whether it’s by totalitarian decree of by a jury of one’s peers, true freedom of speech is not subject to the whim of anyone.

Under traditional First Amendment analysis, content-based speech restrictions can survive only if they are narrowly tailored to promote a compelling government interest. California says its interest is in preventing psychological or neurological damage to young people. The appeals court concluded that the evidence connecting violent video games to this sort of damage is too weak to make restricting the games a compelling government interest.

Weak is an understatement.  For every single case where adverse behavior is even vaguely linked to violent games or movies, there are several hundred million cases where the same material affected no one.

And, it’s not the state’s job to screen children from every harmful influence, nor do we want it to be.  As it is, producers of material containing violence or sex are constantly having to divine where the line is drawn on what’s legal and what isn’t.  When the state becomes the arbiter of what’s good for children, parenting will likewise become a guessing game of what is allowable and what isn’t.

It’s time the state start leaving parenting to parents and stop trying to use the criminal justice system to impose cultural conformity on the entire population.  Not everything has to be a crime.

Anal vibrator “rendered safe” by EOD team.

Tuesday, April 20th, 2010

According to the Tahoe Daily Tribune:

An anal vibrator believed to be a bomb caused the California Highway Patrol to briefly evacuate its South Lake Tahoe area office on April 7.

The incident began around 4:30 a.m. when a California Highway Patrol officer contacted a 60-year-old man in a “No Parking” zone on Highway 89 near Luther Pass, according to a CHP report.

The officer arrested the man after allegedly finding what was believed to be methamphetamine.

During a subsequent search, officers found “a suspicious wire, with an on/off switch” in the man’s front left pocket leading to his anal cavity, according to the report.

If part of the plan of the 9/11 terrorists was to have Americans thinking that every strange object was a possible terrorist bomb, they succeeded beyond their wildest dreams.  Remember Boston, 2007?

About 9 a.m., “the EOD team rendered the device safe and determined it was not an explosive device.

‘Open Not Clothed’

Wednesday, April 14th, 2010

dailyevergreen.com has a respectful obituary for Seattle’s Lusty Lady.  After 27 years the strip club succumbed to ever escalating competition from the internet.

The marquee was not brought down by the creation of the nearby Seattle Art Museum. When the Four Seasons Hotel built over the Lusty Lady, the marquee read “Open Not Clothed” and would not be bought out…

Only in the “Emerald City” could an art museum coexist peacefully within a block of a vintage strip club. City officials should not neglect the historical relevance of monuments like the Lusty Lady in lieu of hard economic times. Now more than ever, Seattle and Washington state residents need to be reminded of their ability to scrape by through it all.

The Seattle Lusty Lady is survived by its San Francisco sibling which split from its original owners in 2003 when the strippers themselves bought it and now operate it as a co-op.  Also notable about the San Fransisco Lucky Lady is the fact that it has been and continues to be the only unionized sex business in the U.S.   According to the anti-sex crusaders, I suppose that means they’re exploiting themselves.

Is Google moving out of the U.S.?

Wednesday, April 7th, 2010

I have no idea whether this is a credible story or not.  According to openPR.com, Google is planning to move from California to the Canary Islands.

Because as of a sudden, an internal source states that a large-scale displacement of the entire headquarters of the U.S. search engine titan Google Inc. to Tenerife has been announced. This result was due mainly to the fact that new U.S. media laws of the Obama government will put a significant restriction to the YouTube video portal and search results of the Google Video search, according to an internal document. For quite some time U.S. courts and lawyers specialized in intellectual property right have been dealing with that matter, since more and more illegal pirate copies in so-called high definition (HD-)quality on YouTube and Google would be freely available. Assumingly the driving force behind the law seems to be the U.S. music industry that has suffered billions of losses since many years.

But also the fact plays a role that California is very close to a total bankruptcy, as the first US state ever. As it turned out, the situation is even worse than in Greece. There is even a risk of a spread over to other states. California is facing a total budget loss of 20 billion U.S. dollars (14,73 million Euro). So it lacks of the chance to proceed with further necessary investments in the electrical and networking infrastructure, as mentioned in the internal document.

This has more to do with censorship arguments surrounding proposed laws designed to protect intellectual property than any kind of sex hysteria, but Google has been taking a very high profile in the censorship wars with regard to China and Australia, so it will be a key player in internet regulation and censorship overall.  Whether Google actually plans to move remains to be seen.