Archive for the ‘Sex Offender Registries’ Category

Sex offenders may lose 1st Amendment Rights

Monday, February 14th, 2011

Vermont is considering a bill that would prohibit sex offenders from using an alias when posting on line.

Vermont lawmakers are considering making it a crime for convicted sex offenders to use false names on social media sites like Facebook, after one such incident was reported in the state.

One incident?  I guess it doesn’t take much to get a law introduced in Vermont.

Interesting how Facebook has taken over from Craigslist as the main playground for sex crazed adults looking to violate children.

The bill under review would make the crime a misdemeanor punishable by up to two years in jail. The committee said it would continue to consider the bill.

So merely using an alias can get you up to two years in prison, huh?  Remember the old days when you actually had to have an actual victim to get prison time?  Of course, the U.S. does have an reputation to maintain.

Thanks to Maggie McNeil for the link to this story.

The mark of Satan

Tuesday, November 2nd, 2010

Sex offenders in St. Tammany parish, Louisiana were required to post this sign on Halloween or face jail time.  According to nola.com:

State law prohibits convicted sex offenders from distributing candy on Halloween to anyone under the age of 18 or from wearing masks, disguises or hoods during the holiday. Offenders are also instructed not to put up decorations for the holiday, answer their door to trick-or-treaters or leave their porch lights on while children are roaming the neighborhoods.

This is a few days late, but this is the first time I’ve actually seen the required sign so I thought it would be worth posting anyway.  I first wrote about this here.

Sex offender living next door? Maybe, maybe not.

Tuesday, November 2nd, 2010

The National Sex Offender Registry says there are three registered sex offenders living at Walker’s Deluxe Motel in Dothan, Alabama.  There’s nothing unusual about that except for the tiny detail that there really aren’t any sex offenders living at the hotel.  The Registry shows seven sex offenders living at another nearby hotel, but the reality is there are only two living there.

The article in the Dothan Eagle explains the reasons for the inaccuracies and the registry website itself provides the following disclaimer:

“It is possible that information accessed or obtained through this website may not reflect current residences, employment, school attendance, or other information regarding such individuals, and users are forewarned that it is incumbent upon them to verify information.”

It’s interesting that the owner says they evict people from the hotel when they receive the notification that they are registered sex offenders, but they are apparently not permitted to ask in advance.  So, the notifications from the registry result in offenders being forced to move which is a factor in making the registry inaccurate.

The last place to expect a rational response to sex crimes would be a government office.  Politicians just aren’t equipped with the require critical thinking skills.

Since sex offender registries have been such a screaming success…

Monday, October 25th, 2010

Suffolk County, New York is going to create a registry for people who abuse animals.

From HuffPo:

Suffolk County, on the eastern half of Long Island, moved to create the nation’s first animal abuse registry this week, requiring people convicted of cruelty to animals to register or face jail time and fines.

And what is the reasoning used to justify a data base so people can find out who in their community have been abusing animals?

We know there is a very strong correlation between animal abuse and domestic violence,” said Suffolk County legislator Jon Cooper, the bill’s sponsor. “Almost every serial killer starts out by torturing animals, so in a strange sense we could end up protecting the lives of people.”

Yep.  Since some serial killers started out as animal abusers, it only stands to reason that people would want to know which of their neighbors are potential serial killers.  I propose that we start a registry for short, skinny, messianic, long haired, vagrants because we all know that they have a tendency to attract followers, whom they refer to as their “family”, and murder movie stars and rich people.

I bookmarked this story last week, so it’s a little old, but it’s interesting to note that, of all the mainstream media coverage I saw of this story, not one questioned the utter paranoia and irrationality exhibited by such an act or idiocy.  What does it mean when new outlets report stories like this with a straight face?

Back to prison for not reporting bridge address

Tuesday, October 5th, 2010

I’ve been meaning to post this for several days.

According to NBC12.com:

A New York man who served a year behind bars for attempted sexual abuse 14 years ago is heading back to prison for failing to report his new address under a bridge.

After pleading guilty for the felony count of failing to register, he now faces 1-3 years behind bars.

Credit for the link goes to Sex Offender Research, an excellent source of news on that topic.

Once a sex offender, always a sex offender?

Sunday, September 19th, 2010

There is an interesting article in the Houston area Champions Sun about the Texas sex offender registry.  Dr Jerome Brown who has treated some 400 sex offenders since 1984 says it’s a myth that sex offenders are repeat offenders.

Labeling someone as a sex offender for life is problematic, according to Brown. Studies on the topic have only been released in recent years, however, the research does not indicate that tagging individuals as sex offenders is effective, he said.

“It’s actually more detrimental because they have trouble living a normal life. They’re permanently on the outside,” Brown said. “This can often be destructive because he’ll give up and won’t try to do or make his life better.”

Gee, you mean setting someone up for a lifetime of  systematic state sanctioned  persecution isn’t conducive to making someone more socially responsible.  I’m stunned!

Brand [sp] said there needs to be a change in the risk assessment of sex offenders, with those on the highest level being monitored extensively and those on the lower end not being monitored at all.

“A 16-year-old who’s had sex with a 13-year-old is treated and often regarded as the same fixated pedophile that’s attracted to children, but they are different as night and day,” Brown said. “One is a kid that made a dumb mistake and the other is a very dangerous predator. Should they be treated the same?”

The comments are just as interesting as the article and, surprisingly, all are sympathetic to arguments against the sex offender registry.  One points out how nice it must be for these state paid doctors to determine how long these offenders need treatment.

Think about it, what a business to be in, you have the state funneling your clients in your door on a daily basis and depending where you are in your “business plan” and possibly how greedy you are you can make money hand over fist for a very long time.

Another comment notes the disproportionate punishment that sex related crimes bring.

Yes, there are terrible people out there who do terrible things. But we don’t punish the person who shoplifted a pack of cigarettes the same way we punish a bank robber. Why are we punishing a person who looked at pornography on an office computer the same way we punish someone who commits rape?

Another commenter asks why other serious crime is treated so much differently.

Question…where can I click on a button on the internet to find a website showing where convicted murderers, aggravated robberers and other violent felons are living in my community?? NOWHERE!

Overall, a good article, not that we’re likely to see sex offender registries overturned anytime soon.  Those who commit sex related offenses will probably always be fair game for persecution.

Stunning revelation: Georgia’s sex offender registry is filled with errors

Wednesday, September 1st, 2010

According to the Atlanta Journal Constitution, a state audit showed that the states registry “is flawed with error-ridden, out-of-date and incomplete information.”

Just one example:

A special state review board, set up to rank offenders by their danger to the community, is so understaffed and backlogged that it has not classified thousands of offenders. The report found that only 6 percent of the state’s almost 20,000 offenders have been classified by the board, which due to budget cuts has only four full-time and four part-time staffers.

A parent’s perspective:

Christina Barnette, 40, an Atlanta mother of three young children, said that she checked the sex offender website in the past — and didn’t find it very helpful. “All it told me was there’s a lot of sex offenders and it doesn’t matter where you live,” she said.

Sex offender registries are one of the more irrational manifestations of the hysteria surrounding sex crimes.  Disguised as a measure to protect children (as is the case with nearly all bad programs), they do little to alleviate any danger and a lot to inflame the public fear.  Most sex crimes against children are perpetrated by people known to the family, not strangers.  Sex registries have now acquired the same reputation as the “No Fly List” in terms of inaccuracy and ineffectiveness.  Basically they are a joke supported by a lot of very vocal self-serving fear mongers who want to feel like they are “making a difference”.

The sex offender registry as a means for society to forgive offenders.

Saturday, July 31st, 2010

On Thursday’s Stossel, they had a segment addressing the government’s crusade to prosecute under age sex.  He had a couple guests who were victims of that carpet bombing approach to sex prosecution.  Both  were prosecuted for having sex with other teens when they themselves were teens.  As a result they were branded for life and cast as being no different from those who abduct, rape, and murder children.

To debate the issue, Stossel had former sex crimes prosecutor Wendy Murphy arguing in support of the teen on teen sex laws and Reason Magazine’s Radley Balko arguing against them.

I swear the premiere moment in the show comes when Murphy actually argues that the sex offender registry facilitates social forgiveness.  It happens late in the video below at 4:10.

That is so far fetched as to be delusional.

Ok for sex offender to see nudity

Thursday, July 29th, 2010

There are times when you just have to ask someone to pinch you to see if you’re just stuck in some kind of nightmare where common sense is completely absent.

As if sex offenders aren’t saddled with enough goofy irrational rules, Oklahoma also thinks they shouldn’t be permitted to view anything that shows nudity.  Fortunately, a federal appeals court struck down the restriction.

According to onenewsnow.com:

The Eighth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals has ruled that a sex offender who committed crimes in Oklahoma and Kansas will be allowed to possess material that depicts nudity.

Jerry Lynn Simons is due to be released from federal prison in September after serving two years for failing to register as a sex offender in Nebraska when he moved to the state. But a lower court ruled that he will have to comply with 20 provisions, including not viewing nude pictures.

Of course, that doesn’t sit well with anti-sex crusaders who are firmly committed to the theory that porn is the root cause for sex crimes.

The reason for the ruling isn’t exactly a clear cut victory over the forces of repression.

the Eighth Circuit struck down the restriction on viewing nude pictures based on the idea that Simons would be barred from viewing biology textbooks or some works of art.

So, apparently they would be ok with it if it didn’t threaten the guy’s right to view art and biology works.  If you’re hoping the courts can always be counted on to protect us from censorship, you’re in for a surprise.  They have made quite plain their belief that there is such a hing as a little censorship.

Sex offender registries are getting about as useful as the no-fly list.

Thursday, July 22nd, 2010

Like the no-fly list, you apparently don’t need to be a threat to anyone to get your name on it.

Ever since Dan Wheeler had his identity stolen by a sex offender fifteen years ago, his name has been included on the sex offender registry in Washington state.  He has been trying to get it taken off ever since.  The state’s response?  Essentially they told him “Tough shit”.

According to king5.com:

“I’ve been to police and prosecutors and they all tell me there’s nothing that can be done,” said Wheeler.

He may be right. A spokesman for the Washington State Patrol, which handles the State Sex Offenders Database, says when someone is arrested and uses an alias, that alias is kept on file forever.  The concern is that if authorities delete the alias, the criminal could go back to using it again.

The link for this item was gratuitously plucked from theagtiator.com.