Archive for the ‘Prostitution’ Category

Trafficking study is exposed as junk science

Wednesday, March 23rd, 2011

While I have stopped making regular updates to this site, Maggie McNeill brought an absolutely stunning news article to my attention.  Stunning, not because it reveals any surprises to us, but because it’s blunt and comes from a credible mainstream news source.

SF Weekly today published an article that essentially exposes research done by Schapiro Group as junk science, specifically highlighting the role played by the Women’s Funding Network and an Atlanta based anti-prostitution group called A future Not a Past.

It’s now clear it used fake data to deceive the media and lie to Congress. And it was all done to score free publicity and a wealth of public funding.

My previous articles about the Schapiro Group “studies” are here and here.

In addition to my coverage of these bullshit studies, Maggie McNeill has torn them up one side and down the other on her blog, The Honest Courtesan.

The real story here is that the mainstream media mindlessly repeats the ridiculous false claims made by these rescue organizations lending credibility to the scam, thereby aiding and abetting the fleecing of the taxpayers as well as anyone else who donates to these organizations.

And, if you’re a resident of Georgia, you will probably not be too pleased to know that your tax dollars helped fund this organization.  You may want to go take a shower, because you’ve just been violated.  Next time you want to get fucked, I suggest you check out the online adult classifieds and hire a professional.  You know, someone with integrity.

Time to outlaw prostitution in Nevada?

Tuesday, February 22nd, 2011

Democrat and Senate Majority Leader, Harry Reid says yes.

Reid thinks prostitution isn’t a moral enough business for the gambling capitol of the United States.

“We should do everything we can to make sure the world holds Nevada in the same high regard you and I do,” Reid continued.

Be sure and vote in the reader poll and take note of which viewpoint is favored.

And, also, take note of the fact that this proposal is being initiated by a liberal.  I too often hear from the left that the nation’s war on sex is the fault of conservatives.  The reality is that laws designed to regulate sexual activity are almost always supported by both major political parties.  Many popular women’s rights groups are among the most ardent advocates of laws that criminalize a woman’s use of her own body to earn a living.  Make no mistake, it doesn’t matter if the laws target the demand or supply side.  Women are always the ones who suffer for it.

Craigslist prostitute-turned-teacher gives up

Saturday, February 12th, 2011

Melissa Petro is giving up her fight to keep her job with the New York City school system the face of a powerful effort to fire her for openly admitting to selling sex on Craigslist before becoming a teacher.

Pietro, who resigned late last month and promised never again to seek employment with the D.O.E., continued, “Although I could have fought my removal I have decided, instead, to move on. Regardless of the outcome of a trial, which I have every reason to believe I would have won, I do not believe I would have ever been welcomed back to the classroom by the Department of Education.”

New York City has proven that, while it’s nearly impossible to fire an inept teacher,  it is indeed possible to fire one that isn’t.

Nice work, New York Department of Education.  I’m certain the Devil has reserved a special place in hell for you.

Cops caught fraternizing with the enemy

Thursday, February 10th, 2011

Several cops in Raleigh, NC are the subject of an internal affairs investigation for their involvement with a representative of the world’s oldest profession.

Internal affairs investigators used GPS tracking devices and hidden cameras to uncover the activity, which involved sex with a prostitute who frequents Bragg Street in downtown Raleigh, the sources said.

Speaking on the condition that they not be identified, the sources said the Raleigh Police Department’s Internal Affairs Unit raided the Southeast District Substation on Crosslink Road over the weekend and that several officers there were told to turn in their guns, badges and patrol cars.

Of course, the law that governs everyone else also applies to cops, right?  Oops.  I guess not:

Wake County District Attorney Colon Willoughby said his office is aware of the investigation and that criminal charges did not seem likely. He declined to say why or to discuss the matter further.

Well, these are probably just a bunch of young rookies who made a mistake, right?  Oops.  I guess not:

One of the names tied to the investigation, sources said, is Raleigh police Sgt. Rick Armstrong, who is the president of the Raleigh Police Protective Association, a professional association that represents the interests of police officers.

Armstrong, who also is a member of the state Law Enforcement Training and Standards Commission, said Tuesday that he could not speak about the matter, on the advice of the Raleigh Police Department’s Internal Affairs Bureau.

Well, surely some honest cops came forward and management acted quickly to put an immediate end to the activity just as they would if the culprits were ordinary citizens, right?  Oops.  I guess not:

In a statement Tuesday afternoon, Police Chief Harry Dolan did not address the specific allegations but acknowledged a “comprehensive” internal investigation into “improper conduct” stemming from a police officer’s complaint in late 2009.

Well, at a very minimum, an outraged city government must be demanding that the officers be publicly identified as is the case for anyone else caught with a prostitute and charged under the relevant criminal statutes making clear to the public that police are not above the laws they hold everyone else accountable to, right?  Oops.  I guess not:

Mayor Pro-Tem Mary-Ann Baldwin, who chairs the city’s Law and Public Safety Committee, said such incidents “reflect poorly” on the police department but that police officers generally do an excellent job.

“Anytime you have something like this you want a quick resolution and I would imagine our residents who would be impacted by this expect that,” she said.

So, after secretly studying the matter for over a year, now that it’s public they are suddenly in favor for a “quick resolution”.  My guess is that, had it not been for the unidentified “sources”, the city would have been quite content if this story never saw the light of day.

So what happens now, Chief Dolan?

“When all the available facts are present, appropriate decisions will be made concerning any personnel action that should be taken pursuant to departmental policy in response to administrative violations.”

Ohhhhhh!  I see.  When ordinary people go to a hooker to get laid, it’s a crime against the public morals where they get their picture in the paper, pay big money for a lawyer, end up being fined and probably spend some time in jail, and (in some states) get their car seized.  But when a cop does it, it’s an “administrative violation”.

Can we say “cover up”?  Can we say “blue wall of silence”?

Using an underage prostitute worse than murder

Thursday, February 10th, 2011

A proposed Georgia law beefs up the penalties for engaging is unapproved sex, specifically prostitution.

Among other things, it would permit prosecutors to target the spouses of prostitutes and it would require that those who use prostitutes to magically know whether a hooker is underage even if she claims to be older:

For people charged with human trafficking, the bill would prohibit such defenses as relation by blood or marriage (for parents exploiting their own children, or men pimping their own wives). It also bars such defenses as “I didn’t know she was 15 years old…she looked 20 to me!” or “Hey, she’s been a prostitute before.”

If that’s not enough, the new law would increase the maximum penalty for using a prostitute under 18 years old to life in prison, essentially making the crime as bad or worse than murder.  Keep in mind that the age of consent in Georgia is 16, so it’s perfect acceptable for a girl to give it away, but selling it to feed and clothe herself is illegal.

Penalties for human traffickers would also be significantly beefed up, with the possibility of life in prison if the victim was under 18, and new fines of up to $100,000. What’s more, the state could seize any real or personal property that a trafficker used for, or bought with the proceeds of, the crime.

Of course, with those kinds of financial incentives, the state will have a lot more reason to convert more prostitution cases into trafficking cases.  And how could they do that?

As for sexual exploitation, the bill would block charges for anyone forced to commit sex crimes, including prostitution, against his or her will.

A young prostitute is now guaranteed an attractive payoff to claim she was coerced and to testify against her pimp, assuming there is someone handy she can accuse of being a pimp.  A pimp can be a landlord, massage parlor owner, or just a boyfriend.  I think the legal term for this is ladder climbing.  Essentially, prosecutors buy custom testimony from low level participants in order to fabricate a case against those higher on the food chain (whether a food chain exists or not).  And make no mistake, a youthful witness will often say whatever a prosecutor wants in exchange for a free pass to walk out without charge.

Aside from their potential to raise revenue for the state through fines and property seizures, sleazy laws like this are designed to generate arrest and conviction statistics to prove fear-mongering claims that don’t otherwise jibe with reality.  Anti-prostitution crusaders in Georgia are determined to do everything in their power to convince the world that Atlanta has a serious child prostitution problem.  I have written about their strategy to generate statistics in the past and Maggie McNeil did a very thorough two-part critique of the  so-called independent “research” methods designed to generate those forgone conclusions.

Cragslist prostitutes moving to Facebook?

Thursday, February 10th, 2011

The answer is yes according to this Fox News article:

[New York] City sex workers are now increasingly plying their trade on Facebook, after popular classifieds website Craigslist shut its Erotic Services section last year, according to a recent study.

Since the story is being reported by a number of mainstream news outlets, it will be interesting to see if it gains strength or quietly fades away.   I think the latter may be the case.

For now, Facebook doesn’t have a specific policy dealing with prostitution but takes a hard stance against illegal activities, spokesman Andrew Noyes told FoxNews.com. “We will take down content, disable accounts, and may take further action including escalating illegal activity to law enforcement. We strictly enforce this policy through proactive investigations and response to user reports.”

While the public was largely complacent about the censorship campaign against Craigslist, they would be much less likely to sit idly by if anti-prostitution  crusaders start shitting on one of their favorite playgrounds.  They are also unlikely to find any support from elected officials who view Facebook as a recruiting ground for supporters.  Nonetheless, the media always profits by exploiting exploitation paranoia, so it could gain some traction.

Those selling sex, on the other hand, might find Facebook a more attractive place to advertise since they have far more control over who can see their ads.

The big question is how long before CNN’s Amber Lyon sets herself up as a teen sex slave on Facebook to prove that all minors on Facebook are now at risk of being trafficked.  This mainstream press theater would be entertaining if it weren’t for the public being so easily taken in by such trash reporting.

Monday Links

Monday, February 7th, 2011
  • After an anonymous tip, a female teacher in Ohio is accused of having sex with five of her male students. She “faces up to 81 years in jail if she is convicted of 16 counts of sexual battery and three offenses involving an underage person.” The sexual “battery” charge presumes that the sex was unwanted.  I’m guessing that’s probably not the case (although reality does not play a major roll when it comes to the legalities of sex with  minors).
  • Florida is going to consider banning “simulated” obscenity, whether clothed or unclothed, in material accessible to minors.  Perhaps next year they will outlaw having dirty thoughts within 1000 feet of a minor.  No more suggestive cheer leading moves or dancing in Florida.
  • to minors by adding a clause that says that “a suspected sexual predator purposely and knowingly sent obscene electronic messages to a minor”.   This is apparently a attempt to reconcile free speech rights with their desire to restrict free speech rights.
  • Biblical porn: “My lover thrust his hand through the hole, and my insides groaned because of him.”  Surprise!  The Bible is conflicted about sex!

The idiocy of typical sex trafficking articles

Monday, January 31st, 2011

I came across an article about sex trafficking in Chron that typifies the  way the problem is vaguely hyped by law enforcement and the way it’s mindlessly reported by the media who simply parrot what they hear from government.  The article begins immediately with claim followed by a disclaimer that says they can’t prove the claim.

Authorities know that thousands of men, women and children are trafficked into Texas. Proving it in a court of law is another matter.

What differentiates trafficking from illegal immigration is the use of force.  But here is where it starts to get goofy.

“They may be victims of trafficking that do not even know it,” Sean McElroy of Homeland Security Investigations told the newspaper.

Yeah, they probably thought they were over here voluntarily, but DHS clearly knows what’s going on in their heads better than they do.

McElroy handles trafficking and smuggling investigations for U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement’s Houston office. He said many victims initially appear to be illegal immigration cases until weeks of interviews show that they entered the United States against their will.

When it comes to cops, no does not mean no.  They just keep asking until you say yes.  In 1989, law enforcement was able to get four innocent people to confess to the notorious “Central Park Jogger” rape case after hours of “interviews”, so it should come as no surprise that incarcerated illegals can eventually be pressured to agree to the government’s version of events.

So, of the thousands of trafficking cases alluded to in the first paragraph, hpw many have been prosecuted?

Federal court records show no cases of human trafficking in 10 South Texas counties since 2000. Corpus Christi police said they cannot recall any cases where they were able to charge a suspect with trafficking, despite suspicions.

And what is the state doing to crack down on this epidemic of non-identifiable crime?

Beginning this year, state law requires newly sworn law enforcement officers to take a basic course in human trafficking. Legislation has been proposed with the aim of equipping local law enforcement to crack down on human trafficking rings that lead to or pass through Texas.

And where is all this trafficking not happening?

The attorney general’s study said the state’s busiest trafficking artery was the 900 miles of Interstate 10 that runs from El Paso to Houston, making both cities the state’s busiest trafficking centers.

Articles like these are common and so self-contradictory that they don’t hold up under even the slightest bit of analysis.

Said Hunter, “We still depend largely on kidnapping and prostitution laws to address human trafficking cases. A missing or kidnapped child whose face appears on a milk carton could actually be the victim of human trafficking.”

Well, I guess that last sentence is true.  They may not be able to identify a single case of trafficking, but they have no problem prosecuting prostitution and then calling it trafficking.

The myth that Portland is a sex trafficking mecca

Sunday, January 16th, 2011

When I’m scanning the search engines for prostitution news, there will always be certain hotbeds of activity on the part of the anti-prostitution groups. There is no end to the localities in the U.S. that seem to lay claim to being the trafficking capitol of the U.S. I’ve posted about at least one of these, but it’s become so common that it normally doesn’t get my attention anymore.    The typical news item is an interview of a spokesman for some rescue organization by a local reporter.  Rarely do any reporters challenge what the rescue groups claim nor do they interview anyone who opposes the anti-prostitution agenda.  Essentially, when rescue groups descend on a city, the mainstream press just passes on the their propaganda verbatim.

Portland is regularly one of those cities that is reported as being a major center for sex trafficking.  A search on Google for Portland and trafficking and hub yields over 60,000 links.  When you add children to the search term, it’s still 48,000.  Sex trafficking is one of those trendy sensationalistic stories that the news media love, true or not.

But now that claim has been questioned.  As stated so succinctly by international sex trafficking authority, Laura Agustin:

With cameras rolling on 82nd Avenue last year, Dan Rather dubbed the city “Pornland” in a documentary. “Nightline” declared Portland the “epicenter for child prostitution,” and “World News With Diane Sawyer” called the city a “hotbed of sex trafficking.” But as hundreds gather in Portland this weekend for the third-annual Northwest Conference Against Trafficking, with talks by U.S. Sen. Ron Wyden and actress Daryl Hannah, an examination by The Oregonian reveals that no one really knows if the problem in Portland is any worse than anywhere else.

In her piece in the Oregonian, Nikole Hannah-Jones does what is unheard of in the mainstream media when it comes to rescue industry claims.  She questions the statistics, uncovering their utter lack of credibility.

That raises perhaps the most frequently cited number around child sex trafficking — that 200,000 to 300,000 U.S. youths are at risk of sexual exploitation. The U.S. Department of Justice lists the number on its website. Local law enforcement agencies, McKeel’s office and others have repeated it, and everyone from UNICEF, CNN, The Oregonian and the National Center for Missing & Exploited Children have printed it.

The figure is problematic on two fronts. One, advocates often cite it as the number of children in the sex trade — not just the number at risk of sexual exploitation. Worse, the figure is based on faulty statistics from a 2001 University of Pennsylvania study by Richard Estes and Neil Weiner.

The study took data from an earlier study by Finkelhor, the University of New Hampshire researcher, that counted the number of runaway youths. The Pennsylvania study’s authors then came up with a percentage of these kids they believed to be at risk of sexual exploitation of any kind based on interviews with fewer than 300 teens. It was, Finkelhor said, a guess.

This study is also the source for another commonly cited statistic — that the average age that a child enters prostitution is 12 to 14. Finkelhor has created a fact sheet disputing these and other false child prostitution figures.

I have challenged that “average age of entry” figure here and here.

From what I’ve seen, including comments made on this site, the rescue industry continues to repeat their claims, even knowing they are wrong.  While freely using the inflated figures to rouse public opinion and stimulate funding and donations, when confronted with the fact that their claims are false, some in rescue industry  simply say that the statistics are unimportant because even one child is too many.

Nikole Hannah-Jones deserves a pat on the back for her thoughtful article.  She has no doubt incurred the wrath of Portland’s anti-prostitution crusaders, but she has done great honor to her profession and her newspaper for taking time to investigate.

Luxembourg considers legalizing prostitution

Thursday, January 13th, 2011

Station.lu reports that Luxembourg may legalize brothels.

Currently brothels are legal in Belgium, Germany, Holland and the Czech Republic. Although Amsterdam is well-known for its sex tourism, the largest brothel in Europe, the Pascha, is in Cologne, Germany.