Archive for the ‘Persecution’ Category

Prostitute turned teacher to be fired

Thursday, December 2nd, 2010

Melissa Petro is once again in the news as the New York City education department attempts to fire her.  As I have previously written here and here,  Ms Petro had the unmitigated gall to truthfully discuss her past experiences as a prostitute and stripper before she started teaching.

Petro, 30, is being charged with “conduct unbecoming a teacher,” according to a Department of Education spokeswoman, who would not elaborate on the details.

The PS 70 teacher was suspended in September after The Post revealed she’d been boasting of being a former Craigslist call girl in blog postings bearing her real name and photo.

If you recall, Craigslist came under attack by anti-prostitution activists and several state attorneys general who claimed that they were aiding in the victimization of women and children by continuing to operate an adult services section.  Melissa Petro claimed to have posted there by choice, thereby, undercutting the universal doctrine of anti-prostitution crusaders that all prostitution is coerced.

It’s noteworthy that no one in the crusade to save women from Craigslist has come out in support of the onetime Craigslist hooker.   My guess is that, had she jumped on the bandwagon with those condemning Craigslist, she would not be the target of this current white collar lynching.  As it is, they are apparently perfectly willing to see her victimized by the state.

Especially interesting is the fact that Melissa Petro’s case is being handled so expeditiously in a school system where it is nearly impossible to fire a teacher.  Indeed, bad teachers are reassigned to NYC’s nortorious “rubber rooms” where they can remain on the payroll for years while the city goes through the complicated termination process.

Of all the creepy teachers New York has deemed unfit, they have chosen to focus on a woman who’s only mistake was honestly exercising her First Amendment rights.  I mean, it’s not like she smoked dope and then wanted to be President or something…

Miami cops crack down on immorality

Sunday, November 21st, 2010

Miami cops arrested Carlos Rodriguez for soliciting prostitution on November 9th.   Under the heading of unique physical features, the arrest report notes, “Half a Head”. What would we do without our Blue Knights saving society from those who want to get laid?

While I write endlessly about the persecution of women who sell sex, it’s much more rare that I comment on the other victims of society’s war on sex, the customer.

It’s no secret that anti-prostitution crusaders advocate the state injecting itself into and regulating our most intimate and private relationships.  While they rant about how all prostitution is coercion, they don’t give it a second thought when they use the threat of jail to force everyone to follow their narrow intolerant moral code.  They summarily decree that the moment money is involved, women are being coerced or exploited.  To them the only acceptable terms for a sexual relationship are mutual attraction.

They dismiss the idea that that puts millions of people, of which Mr Rodriguez is only one, at something of a disadvantage.  Laws against prostitution sadistically deny one of humanity’s most pleasurable and intimate interactions to a class of people who are only likely to experience it through the services of a prostitute. That would include many handicapped people, those who have been maimed by war or accidents, those with serious birth defects, the home bound, the bed-ridden, and the just plain ugly (such as myself).

To spell it out, laws against prostitution specifically single out disadvantaged people for persecution.  As long as man has walked the earth society has been defining the powerless as throwaways, unworthy of the rights and privileges that the rest of us take for granted.  Every generation of Americans self-righteously proclaims their abhorrence of witch hunts, moral crusades, and lynchings of past generations, even as they enthusiastically engage in the current ones.  Like the very people who perpetrated that history of marginalizing those they didn’t like, they don’t recognize what they’re doing.  It’s never called persecution by those who doing it.

As one commenter so eloquently wrote a while back, no “normal” person needs to buy sex.  The implication is that sex is a privilege reserved only for so-called normal people.  If you’ve ever been in a discussion about the demand side of prostitution, some moron will invariably make the remark, “I’ve never had to pay for it”.  The implication is that, “I’m among the class of people that women will have sex with without having to pay for it”.  The pure naivety of such an assertion  is stunning.  I don’t know too many people who would dispute that wealth (coupled with generosity) usually plays a part in the dynamic between men and women, regardless of whether an explicit transaction occurs.

The war on prostitution is not just a crusade against a woman’s right to own and control her own body.  It’s also a systematic program of persecution aimed at a minority of the population that no one gives a shit about.  It’s the tyranny of the majority in action. And there is nothing moral, benevolent, or heroic about it.

Back to prison for not reporting bridge address

Tuesday, October 5th, 2010

I’ve been meaning to post this for several days.

According to NBC12.com:

A New York man who served a year behind bars for attempted sexual abuse 14 years ago is heading back to prison for failing to report his new address under a bridge.

After pleading guilty for the felony count of failing to register, he now faces 1-3 years behind bars.

Credit for the link goes to Sex Offender Research, an excellent source of news on that topic.

Would 9 out of 10 prostitutes quit if they could?

Sunday, October 3rd, 2010

The name, Melissa Farley, seems to pop up quite often as an opponent of legalized prostitution.  She was the central voice arguing against prostitution in the  Economist debate last month and she testified in the recent challenge to Canadian anti-prostitution laws.

One oft repeated statistic (see FACT 1) attributed to her says that 9 out of 10 women in prostitution would quit but feel unable to do so.  Let’s ignore the obvious fact that 9 out of 10 people would probably quit working if they had the choice.

Let’s do an analysis of that figure as applied to the industry as a whole:

With the sale of sex being illegal almost everywhere, prostitutes are often forced to operate along side or under the thumb of the sleazy criminal underworld, knowing that they can be victimized with near impunity because they themselves risk prosecution if they report a crime against them.  They are also often the victims of police who can extort favors from them.  The profession has been demonized since the beginning of recorded history, where those who do it are persecuted, marginalized, shamed, stoned, and thrown into prison by “civilized” society.  And, in modern times, they have the rare distinction of being vilified by both right wing religious zealots and left wing militant feminists.

Ms Farley’s claim that 9 out of 10 women would quit if they could is not surprising at all.

What’s really stunning is that 10% wouldn’t quit despite all the hardships.

The real immorality is denying women the option to earn a living with their own bodies just like every other working profession on the planet.  What makes prostitutes different is that they have the nerve to use a part of their bodies that society has collectively declared to be a sacred national treasure and therefore not really owned by the people it’s attached to.

Rescue groups like to point out how being a prostitute is a tough life.   Then, to prove it, they do everything they can to make a prostitute’s life tough.    That reminds me of the drug war which claims that drugs will ruin your life and then proceeds to ruin the lives of drug users.

Abolitionists or Prohibitionists?

Thursday, September 30th, 2010

I’ve started watching the new HBO series called, Boardwalk Empire.  The story begins on the day before the the Volsted Act goes into effect.

What started as a moral crusade, launched the future of modern organized crime.  The underworld was the sole beneficiary of Prohibition.  Everyone else was a victim.

It doesn’t take much to see how the current drug war parallels alcohol prohibition.  They are exactly the same thing.  The criminalization of any recreational activity by consenting adults is prohibition, whether it be drug use, gambling, or sex.

Anti-prostitution activists are like a modern day version of the Anti-Saloon League.  They see the sale of sex as immoral and destructive.  They think, if only it can be eradicated by law, the world would be a better place.  Of course, prostitution is already a crime in all but one state in the U.S. and, as during alcohol prohibition, the business still flourishes.

The problem the anti-prostitution movement faces is that no one really cares.  Prostitution is called “the oldest profession” and most people simply think it’s here to stay.  How could they mobilize an apathetic public?  The rescue industry is the answer to that question.

First, they needed to redefine the issue as one affecting children rather than adults.  They do this by focusing exclusively on children as if adults are an inconsequential minority in the selling of sex.

Secondly, they had to dispel the public perception that prostitution is consensual.  To accomplish that, they adopted new language.  Prostitution is now called trafficking in people.  Slavery.

Thirdly, they had to greatly expand the dimensions of the problem so no one felt safe.  We see this in their profligate use and abuse of inflated statistics.

Finally, they had to recast themselves as heroes.   They now call themselves abolitionists and their mission is to stamp out slavery.

But they aren’t stamping out slavery.  Slavery isn’t just about being forced to do something you don’t want to do.  It’s also about not being free to do what you want.  By preventing people from owning and controlling their own bodies, prohibition makes people slaves to someone else’s morality.

And, like all prohibition, the criminal underworld is the main beneficiary, while everyone else loses.

They may call themselves abolitionists, but they’re really prohibitionists.

Bronx teacher being investigated to see if former sex work is a basis for fresh persecution.

Monday, September 27th, 2010

According to the New York Times, the Bronx teacher who wrote an article for the Huffington Post about the recent  crusade to censor Craigslist has been reassigned.

She said that she used Craigslist to meet men and it provided “a simple, familiar forum through which I could do my business with complete anonymity, from the safety and convenience of my own home.”

[...]

Ms. Petro was hired as a teacher in August 2007, a spokeswoman for the city Education Department, Natalie Ravitz, wrote in an e-mail on Sunday. She said that Ms. Petro worked at Public School 70 in the Bronx and had tenure.

It will be interesting to see if her tenure saves her job.  Being opposed to the war on Craigslist practically brands her as someone who favors the child sex slave industry.  The idea that the anti-prostitution movement is going to permit her to have contact with children in an official capacity doesn’t seem likely.

In fact, they are probably already counting kids to find out how many went missing since she started teaching.

Intolerance. It’s what rules the world.

Thursday, September 16th, 2010

This site is about intolerance.  Intolerance is what makes people persecute other people who are not like them.  It’s what drives all moral crusades.  You can dress it up any way you want, but it’s still intolerance.  And it’s never called persecution by the people who are doing it.

Expression is a right.  Intolerance is not a right.

Burning a Bible, a Qur’an, or a flag is expression.  Intolerance is preventing someone from burning one.

Molly Norris is a cartoonist who protested intolerance by creating the poster that started Everybody Draw Mohammed Day.  She was protesting people who use the threat of violence and murder to suppress ideas and expression.

If there is any single freedom that is more important than all others, it’s freedom of expression.  If you question that, read up on North Korea.

The United States talks a good talk, but rarely walks the walk.  We have a tradition of intolerance from witch burnings to lynchings to the present sex hysteria and drug war.

Unfortunately, Molly’s willingness to stand up for that most important of all freedoms has now cost her her identity.  On the advice of the FBI, Molly will go into hiding in response to death threats from those believe an insult should be punished by violence.

Next time you hear or see something that offends you enough that you think it should be outlawed, think of Molly.  Censorship is the suppression of expression under the threat of force.  If resisted, the force will be amplified as much as necessary to gain compliance.  If you’re willing to do that to a fellow citizen, don’t be surprised when a fellow citizen does it to you.  In fact, don’t be surprised when someday ideas that you hold dear have to be kept secret.   It wasn’t that long ago that admitting to being a Communist or being gay had physical and legal consequences.

It’s a shame that the U.S. doesn’t have as many crusaders against intolerance and as it does intolerant crusaders.

Stagliano Obscenity Charges Dismissed!

Friday, July 16th, 2010

Federal charges against porn producer John Stagliano were summarily dismissed by Judge Richard Leon today almost immediately after the prosecution rested.  The trial is the culmination of a crusade against Stagliano by federal anti-sex zealots for years.   In case you don’t know who John Stagliano is, I blogged about him here.

According to Washington City Paper:

After a series of fuck-ups by the United States Government, the obscenity trial against John “Buttman” Stagliano in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia has been dismissed. Around 4:30 p.m. this afternoon, Judge Richard Leon decided that the prosecution’s case against Stagliano—and two related corporations, John Stagliano Inc. and Evil Angel Productions, Inc.—was “woefully lacking.”

A great way to end the week.  Of course, while Stagliano won, being the target of a federal morality crusade probably left his pocketbook considerably lighter.  And you can be sure that there will be no repercussions for the bumbling  prosecutors.  Cases like this are career builders, and the bodies they leave in their wake are just part of the collateral damage they leave in their wake.

Child porn hysteria gets a dose of sanity from an unlikely source

Friday, May 28th, 2010

According to the New York Times,  U.S. District Court Judge Jack B. Weinstein is defying convention and informing juries of the stiff penalties for child porn charges before they decide the case.

Judge Weinstein, who sits in the United States District Court in Brooklyn, has twice thrown out convictions that would have ensured that the man spend at least five years behind bars. He has pledged to break protocol and inform the next jury about the mandatory prison sentence that the charges carry. And he recently declared that the man, who is awaiting a new trial, did not need an electronic ankle bracelet because he posed “no risk to society.”

Bucking the lynch mob mentality when it comes to child sex abuse accusations can be extremely detrimental to your career and it is exceeding rare to see anyone with the backbone to do it.

Going precisely to the point addresses in my post of last Saturday, Weinstein differentiates between the production of porn which actually abuses children and the viewing of child porn which affects no one.

“I don’t approve of child pornography, obviously,” he said in an interview this week. But, he also said, he does not believe that those who view the images, as opposed to producing or selling them, present a threat to children.

“We’re destroying lives unnecessarily,” he said. “At the most, they should be receiving treatment and supervision.”

Of course, destroying lives is precisely the mission of the anti-sex crusaders who enthusiastically prosecute people under obscenity laws when the material does not even use children as is the case in writing, graphic arts, and computer simulated images.

But the tough penalties have chafed at many judges, echoing previous battles over drug cases.

That’s a great comparison because, like all possession laws, the crusaders are not protecting anyone.  They are simply using the law to persecute those with lifestyles they disapprove of.  Some people are starting to see through the strategy and are becoming increasingly disgusted with it.

I don’t see this as a turning point, but it’s nice to see an occasional hero stand up to the intimidation that the crusaders use to suppress any challenge to their own propaganda.

Speaking of women’s rights…

Friday, April 2nd, 2010

Last night I watched a movie called The Stoning of Soraya M. It’s a true story of an Iranian woman who is falsely accused of adultery by her husband who wants out of their marriage.  The story is exceptionally well produced, dramatic, and is intense from beginning to end.

I think the movie vividly exemplifies the mindless mob mentality that engulfs morality crusades, propelling them out of control.  It’s also a stark reminder of the power of religion to fuel hate, defy reason, and perpetuate injustice.

If you’re a woman concerned about women’s rights on a worldwide scale, there certainly seem to be a lot more worthy targets of your moral crusade than women who engage in sex work.  At least have the integrity to focus your zealotry on those who want your help instead of declaring that any woman who does sex work by choice is in denial.

Anyone who thinks that porn is an assault on women ought to see this movie to get a little perspective of what a real assault looks like.