Archive for the ‘United Kingdom’ Category

World Sports Prostitution Hysteria

Tuesday, August 10th, 2010

As Laura Agustin writes, the paranoid projections of mass migration of prostitutes to the 2012 Olympics and 2014 Commonwealth Games is already heating up.  As I wrote before, wildly inflated predictions of prostitutes descending on sports events is nothing new and most of the mainstream media eats it up and uncritically regurgitates the fear mongering.

Brenden O’Neill had an excellent piece back in March that illustrated just how the projections are inflated for effect and have no basis in reality.

By the way, if you’re interested in a credible perspective of the sex trade as it really is, I suggest you visit Laura Agustin’s blog.    Indeed, on this topic she is like a candle in in a very dark room.

UK job centers offer jobless women porn work

Friday, May 14th, 2010

So, if you’re unemployed in the UK, you might find yourself looking for a job at one of the government run job centers.  And, if you’re female, you just might find that there is highly paid positions available for those willing to get naked in front of a webcam.

According to digitaljournal.com:

The unemployed women are told they can earn up to £700 a week if they strip naked on webcams, engage in sexually explicit conversations with customers, and perform sex acts.

The adult agency Faceclick recruiting for the work tells applicants to perform “activities that you feel comfortable with” while naked in front of the webcam.

I’ve always found it a bit disingenuous that the public disparages those who earn a living using their bodies for sex while those who earn a living by having their bodies pummeled into jello in a boxing ring are revered as sports heroes.

One 19-year-old woman, requesting to remain anonymous, said she was shocked a taxpayer-funded government agency was recruiting for the sex industry.

Would she prefer that her tax money go instead to support the unemployed woman?

She said: “My job in a call center is a fixed-term contract that’s coming to an end and I’ve just taken out a car loan so I’m desperate for work. But I’m not so desperate that I’m prepared to perform disgusting acts on an internet sex line.”

The welfare state makes it easy for unemployed people to be picky about what kind of job they will take.  I suspect the same women would not be inclined to clean toilets, either.

But, alas, the real hero of the story is identified at last.

A spokeswoman for the DWP said: “We are aware of public concern about advertising these vacancies. We have undertaken a public consultation on this issue and we are reviewing existing policy in light of the responses received.”

She added that before 2003, the Jobcentre Plus’s policy was to refuse all job vacancies from the adult entertainment industry. But the policy was challenged in the High Court by Ann Summers, the sex toy and lingerie business, which argued it should be allowed to advertise in Jobcentres. They won their case.

Nice work, Ann Summers.

Spencer Tunick is at it again

Wednesday, May 5th, 2010

I think of it as an artist who has made it his mission in life to bring a moment’s sanity to each city that is lucky enough to earn his interest.  How does he do it?  He asks people top get naked by the hundreds.  Sometimes he has to turn people away.  After he leaves, of course, they are free to go back to their paranoia of human flesh (although there seems to be less of that in Europe than in the U.S. where being naked is equated to a physical assault).

This time the lucky cities were Salford and Manchester in the UK.

Over 4,000 people applied for 1,000 places for ‘Everyday People’, which is being staged in eight secret locations around Salford and Manchester – four today and four tomorrow.

The event is to celebrate the tenth birthday of The Lowry, the gallery and arts venue in Salford’s former docks, where many of Lowry’s paintings are displayed.

More about the gallery and about the event here.

Google ranks nations by their internet censorship

Thursday, April 22nd, 2010

Google recently put up a list ranking world governments according to their demands for user data and data removal and guess what?  The U.S. ranks right up there with the UK and Brazil at the top.

That should come as a surprise given Hillary Clinton‘s remarks on the importance of keeping the internet free.  Of course, for most of us, there is nothing surprising about he contradiction.  Western democracies perpetually crusade in favor of censorship except they disguise it as being “for the children”.

From the Christian Science Monitor:

“Government censorship of the web is growing rapidly: from the outright blocking and filtering of sites, to court orders limiting access to information and legislation forcing companies to self-censor content,” Chief Legal Officer David Drummond wrote on the official Google blog.

[...]

The data does not include government requests for removal of copyrighted content or for the removal of pornography, which Google says it censors on its own. The report also doesn’t indicate whether Google complied with or challenged any requests.

It’s nice to see Google bring this discussion out into the open.  So much nicer than hearing about it after the fact as when the U.S. intelligence agencies illegally spied on American citizens with the help of the country’s major telephone service suppliers.  When the government intentionally operates outside the law as it did in that case, companies know immediately that failure to comply could be a costly proposition.   And if there’s anything that the Bush wiretapping scandal has shown, it’s that there are no repercussions when the government breaks the law, so there is no incentive not to do it again.

Male sex slaves being trafficked into Scotland

Wednesday, April 14th, 2010

Yep.  They found two of them and, as we all know, this portends an epidemic that is likely to sink the entire island under the sheer weight of human depravity.

According to dailyrecord.co.uk:

In the first known cases of male sex trafficking to hit Scotland, two men were smuggled in from Africa and imprisoned in flats.

The men were victims of separate incidents. One was forced to take part in pornography, while the other was sold for sex.

Yeah, I’ll bet there is just such a shortage of male porn stars in Scotland that they have no choice but to import them.

There are around 700 trafficked women in the UK but when men are trafficked here, it tends to be for manual labour – not sex.

Just 700?  That’s practically nothing.  It could be a lot worse.  They could be Ohio.

Mr Heng, who is service manager of NHS Open Road, said the male sex trade often mirrored what happened to women.

He said: “Whatever happens with women involved in prostitution, we will usually see happening with men. It tends to take a couple of years, that’s all.

“So just like we are aware of women being trafficked into Scotland for prostitution, I think we need to be aware that it will happen more with men.

“It is something we are going to have to be vigilant about. It is very much a new feature in Scotland but it is something that will happen here.”

So on the basis of two guys, he is predicting a growing trend which should be good for business since Mr Heng is an anti-prostitution crusader with the End Prostitution Now campaign.  He declares that there is no such thing as safe prostitution, which of course, is a certainty if it’s illegal.  This reminds me of government propaganda telling pot smokers that marijuana will ruin their lives and then setting out to prove it by arresting them and ruining their lives.

UK law pre-emptively punishes IP crimes

Saturday, April 10th, 2010

Last week the UK Parliament rushed through a bill that grants the government sweeping new powers to censor and disconnect websites and users who might commit a copyright violation.

Of course, punishing someone for an act that isn’t a crime, but might lead to a crime is nothing new.  Almost all laws against gambling, drug use, and other consensual victimless activities are justified on the basis that these activities might lead to acts which harm people.    Most citizens readily swallow the fear mongering sales pitch government uses to justify these laws and only object when a law directly impinges upon their own life.  Since  individual laws are typically tailored to target a minority of the population, liberties are continuously whittled away right before the eyes of a largely complacent public.

What makes laws like this one chilling is that the internet is fast becoming indispensable to daily life.  We are on a trajectory where people will become dependent on the internet for anything having to do with financial transactions, communications, shopping, education, social interactions, and political activities.  In other words, the internet will be as vital to life as transportation, food, housing, and energy.  Cutting someone off from such basic necessities is rarely contemplated even after conviction of a serious crime, much less the accusation that someone might possibly maybe potentially commit a crime.

In any case, for anyone who has seen the movie, “Minority Report“, there is no doubt that the age of punishing “precrime” has become a reality.  When it becomes impossible to go through a day without committing a crime, then your very freedom can be revoked by the government on a mere whim.  In fact, I just bought a book about that very topic, but have not started reading it yet.

Have no doubt that similar legislation will eventually permeate all western democracies.  The entertainment industry has spent a lot of money buying the support of legislators to get laws like this passed.  No matter what government or country, there is no lobby and, thus, no voice for ordinary citizens.

The UK’s new moronic prostitution law

Friday, April 2nd, 2010

Yesterday, Britain’s new prostitution law kicked in making it a crime for a guy to pay for sex with a prostitute who is being exploited through force, deception or threats – regardless of whether or not he knows she is selling her body against her will.

The idiocy is, of course, how do the cops know she is doing it against her will unless they intervene  to find out?  And exactly constitutes a threat?  I work hard at my job under the threat of being fired if I don’t.  And, if a prostitute finds herself in trouble for violating the myriad of laws governing prostitution in the UK, what are the chances that she’s going to claim she was breaking those laws voluntarily if there’s a way she can claim someone else made her do it?

This new law is just a thinly disguised means for the anti-prostitution crusaders to threaten customers with jail for something that is not under their control.   Ultimately, there is no way for johns to have any clue as to the precise circumstances under which a prostitute sells her services, but with the broad definition of exploitation cooked up by the anti-trafficking industry, you can be certain there will be no shortage of johns “brought to justice” under the new law.

Brooke Magnanti: £300/hr hooker turned scientist

Monday, March 29th, 2010

This is not exactly new news, but it’s an interesting story for those who haven’t heard of her.  Brooke Magnanti  worked as a prostitute in London while finishing up her Phd.  She kept her identity a secret for years, writing books about her experiences under the pseudonym, Belle de Jour.  In November, 2009 a former partner threatened to expose her, so she went public.

Wikipedia also has some interesting background about her attempt anonymity.

I’ll bet the anti-prostitution crusaders hate it when these people surface who have not only benefited from their experiences, but completely shatter the stereotype that all prostitutes are exploited sex slaves.

Modern phrenology for online predators?

Sunday, March 28th, 2010

Phrenology was a 19th century pseudoscience that was used to determine a person’s character by examining the shape of their skull.  Phrenology was thought by many to be a means by which a “criminal mind” could be identified.  Phrenology was thrown in the dustbin by the end of the 19th century.

A new form of phrenology is making the headlines these days.  Authorities are suggesting that on-line child predators might be identifiable by their typing technique.  According to telegraph.co.uk:

Researchers believe technology could be used to determine a computer typist’s age, sex and culture within 10 keystrokes by monitoring their speed and rhythm.

Emphasis is mine.  Ok, I’ll give you a moment to pick your jaw up off the floor, take a deep breath, and recovver your composure…

Mr Butler, who heads Newcastle University’s Cybercrime and Computer Security department, said: ”Roy’s research has the potential to be a fantastic tool to aid intelligence gathering for crime fighting agencies, in particular serious and organised crime and for those tracking down paedophiles.

”If children are talking to each other on Windows Live or MSN Messenger, we are looking at ways of providing the chat room moderators with the technology to be able to see whether an adult is on there by the way they type.”

Detecting the difference between the typing of an adult and a child might be plausible, right?  But it gets worse:

He said: ”As part of a sexual offences prevention order, courts currently have the power to ban a sex offender from using a computer.”

”With this technology the courts could force the offender to provide an example of their typing as a way of ensuring they don’t use a computer.”

What is striking is the perspective by government that computer and internet access is still a purely recreational activity and that you can ban someone from using them like you can demand that someone stay sober or stay out of strip clubs.  It’s indicative of an almost complete disconnect from reality.  We are fast approaching the point at which computer access will be as vital to life as transportation.

In any case, the idea that they will use typing characteristics almost as if they were a fingerprint is disturbing, to say the least.  Forensics is a haven for junk science and technology thought to be nearly infallible in the past is regularly uncovered as being far less reliable (but only after a lot of people are sent to prison).

Woman paid by wives to seduce husbands

Wednesday, March 24th, 2010

The Sun has an interesting story about a woman who is paid by wives to see if they can seduce their husbands.   The proper term is honey-trap.

The 45-year-old grandmother and mum-of-four is a highly paid honey-trapper and spends her working life proving whether or not a husband or boyfriend will cheat.

In the past 12 months she has honey-trapped more than 60 men and slept with 15 of them – all at the request of their wives.

Janette says: “It’s my job to prove if a husband or boyfriend is a cheater and I’m being employed by their wives or girlfriends.

Is she really exposing aberrant behavior or just doing what most men are wired to do.  I wonder what percentages are.  I bet she succeeds at temping guys into bed at least half the time.

“I may be paid to sleep with a man, but I am in no way a prostitute.”

No, referring to you as a prostitute would be a disservice to prostitutes.

“You cannot take the cheater out of the man. If it’s there, it will always be there and no committed relationship or marriage is going to change that”

Oh, I was wondering how she rationalized what she was doing.  But, of course, she’s wrong.  Every man is a cheater under the right circumstances, as is every woman.  All a honey-trap does is arrange those circumstances.

“I am thrilled I have helped so many women to get bigger divorce payouts because of their man’s infidelity.

“It’s a great job and I’m paid good money to teach cheating men a lesson.”

Yes, the world probably a better place because of your efforts.  You certainly make the possible inevitable.