Archive for the ‘Iran’ Category

Happy Boobquake Day

Monday, April 26th, 2010

According to this CNN story:

The prayer leader, Hojatoleslam Kazim Sadeghi [of Iran], says women and girls who “don’t dress appropriately” spread “promiscuity in society.”

A college student responded:

Jen McCreight, a self-described atheist, feminist and geek “trapped in Indiana,” took issue with Hojatoleslam Kazim Sadeghi’s message during Friday prayers in Tehran, the Iranian capital.

“Time for a Boobquake,” she wrote. “On Monday, April 26, I will wear the most cleavage-showing shirt I own. … I encourage other female skeptics to join me and embrace the supposed supernatural power of their breasts. Or short shorts, if that’s your preferred form of immodesty.”

Of course, she’s now having to explain that she’s not making light of natural disasters or being demeaning to women.

Speaking of women’s rights…

Friday, April 2nd, 2010

Last night I watched a movie called The Stoning of Soraya M. It’s a true story of an Iranian woman who is falsely accused of adultery by her husband who wants out of their marriage.  The story is exceptionally well produced, dramatic, and is intense from beginning to end.

I think the movie vividly exemplifies the mindless mob mentality that engulfs morality crusades, propelling them out of control.  It’s also a stark reminder of the power of religion to fuel hate, defy reason, and perpetuate injustice.

If you’re a woman concerned about women’s rights on a worldwide scale, there certainly seem to be a lot more worthy targets of your moral crusade than women who engage in sex work.  At least have the integrity to focus your zealotry on those who want your help instead of declaring that any woman who does sex work by choice is in denial.

Anyone who thinks that porn is an assault on women ought to see this movie to get a little perspective of what a real assault looks like.

Congress planning to fight internet censorship

Wednesday, March 10th, 2010

In certain other countries, at least.  Expecting government to protect free speech is a bit like expecting the wolf to protect the hens.  The U.S. has invented numerous exceptions to the First Amendment over the years, so the idea that they can be the guardian of internet freedom worldwide is nothing short of preposterous.

All the lofty rhetoric is really just a disguise for U.S. attempts to interfere with the internal affairs of “unfriendly” countries and destabilize their governments by fomenting popular protest.     If the Obama administration were serious about supporting internet freedom, they would be also be voicing concerns over censorship initiatives in Australia and France (just to name two).

The U.S.  government is no friend to internet freedom. It supports censorship it approves of, such as that spreading through western democracies, and deplores censorship in places like China and Iran where stirring the pot in the name of freedom diverts popular attention from urgent crisis-level problems facing the government at home.

Regardless of their cheer leading, government is the most serious enemy of free speech citizens face because only government has the power to use the threat of force to prevent expression.  And all governments are motivated to support speech they approve of and suppress speech they disapprove of.  The truth of the matter is that they will suppress just as much speech as they can get away with.

Capitol Hill Conference on Internet Censorship

Tuesday, February 23rd, 2010

Hudson Institute to Host Capitol Hill Conference on ‘Tearing Down the Walls of Internet Censorship’

Who: Michael Horowitz, Hudson Institute Senior Fellow
Mark Palmer, former U.S. Ambassador to Hungary
Mariam Memarsadeghi, Iranian human rights activist
Yang Jianli, founder of Initiatives for China

Perhaps they should invite someone from Australia and France, since those democracies seem hellbent on following in the steps of Iran and China (except France and Australia are doing it to “save the children”, so it’s ok).

Cyber attackers retaliate against proposed Australian censorship

Thursday, February 11th, 2010

A group known as “Anonymous” has launched a distributed denial of service (DDoS) attack on Australian government websites this week in protest of government plans to censor porn content that features female ejaculation or small breasted women.

I’m starting to see a lot of stories from news sources worldwide that show an increasing concern that what is taking place in Australia will spread to Europe and the United States.    Clearly, Australia seems to be leading the way to a Western clampdown that is alarming to internet users who have become accustomed to an internet unburdened by government control.   Meanwhile more news items are simultaneously reporting that China’s internet restrictions are a result of their fears that free internet access could destabilize their government.  They will not risk another Tank Man episode occurring.

Controlling porn might be the pretense, but I think there’s no doubt that governments around the world, east and west, are eying the internet as a mechanism which, under the right conditions, could ignite explosive unrest on a national scale before they could do anything to stop it.

The global spread of the graphic footage of the death of Neda Soltani during the Iranian election protests of 2009 generated near instantaneous rabid international condemnation of the Iranian government.

Nothing gets a free pass with the public as much as a crusade to protect children, so you can bet that governments everywhere will leverage off of that fact.  The scourge of pornography will we be the one thing they will all agree needs to be suppressed and much of the world population will enthusiastically support it.