Archive for the ‘Canada’ Category

Craigslist caves in to Canadian intimidation

Monday, December 20th, 2010

Craigslist has caved in to intimidation from the Canadian government and closed its erotic services section there.  Canada is simply following in the footsteps of the United States where government, media, and social pressure was used to sidestep First Amendment protections, ultimately overwhelming Criagslist’s will to resist.  Indeed, government is quickly learning that it can easily defeat free speech and privacy rights simply by informally pressuring the private sector enterprises that provide the access, networking, and financial services to do its bidding.  The pretense, as always, is to protect children.

“Obviously we want to stop trafficking. Obviously we want to stop any involvement of children in prostitution,” said John Lowman, a prostitution expert and SFU criminology professor.

“But basically it’s a moral crusade being fought by prohibitionists and the Conservative government … In Canada, prostitution is legal,” he claimed.

And how do we know it’s really a crusade against prostitution and not a campaign tp help women and children?  Well, because it doesn’t help women and children and, in fact, hurts them.

“Police agencies were having some success finding people involved in trafficking and child prostitution by monitoring Craigslist. So they’re closing down one of the best law enforcement tools they appear to have.”

Also weighing on the issue is Vancouver sex work activist Susan Davis:

“It’s unfortunate they’ve taken away a relatively safe way for workers to meet [and] screen clients,” Davis said. “We’re going to see an increase in street prostitution and all the problems associated with that.”

I previously wrote about her involvement in sex worker’s issues here.

Canada faces freedom crisis

Thursday, December 2nd, 2010

Canada is reeling after recent court decisions that have thrown out laws banning prostitution. The latest court decision is expected today. They are now faced with the very real prospect of having to respect the rights of a class of people who have been almost universally targeted for persecution by the vast majority of the “free” world.

In recent history, civilized nations have been faced with one crisis after another as they have been forced to abandon laws that persecute people considered by enlightened people to be subhuman.  First, racial discrimination was attacked in the courts.  Then women started rebelling for equal treatment, followed more recently by gays.   If this trend keeps up, there will soon be no one left that can be systematically looked down upon.

If history has taught us anything it’s that humans need someone to feel superior to.  If necessary, they will invent such a category.  People who engage in activities like prostitution, gambling, drug use, using profanity, being naked, and dressing wrong have all been enthusiastically declared to be fair targets for institutionalized social and criminal persecution in advanced modern civilizations.

From the Toronto Sun article:

[Crown attorney Michael Morris] told the appeal court that if the stay isn’t extended, prostitutes would flock to Ontario from around the country and police would be hampered in their efforts to crack down on human trafficking and the exploitation of sex workers.

Mr Morris apparently didn’t get the memo.  Hookers won’t be flocking to Ontario.  They are way too busy following major sporting events.   In any case, his adherence to the myth that anti-prostitution laws are intended to benefit sex workers is ludicrous.  The laws were struck down because their effect was harmful to prostitutes.  Prostitution laws have nothing to do with the safety of anyone and everything to do with codifying moral superiority for self-righteous crusaders.

And [Toronto Mayor] Ford thought transit was going to be a headache.

Yeah, it’s certainly going to be a challenge adjusting to the idea that people have the right to have sex without the government telling them when, where, how, and with whom they can do it.

“Legal” prostitution in Canada

Wednesday, November 3rd, 2010

Anyone who reads news relating to prostitution in other countries soon realizes that “legal” does not mean legal in the sense that prostitution is treated like other businesses.  Nope.  When it comes to prostitution, legal often means slightly less illegal.   It’s like calling a glass half full or half empty.

Peggy Curran at the Montreal Gazette has a thoughtful article about how ridiculous and counter productive these laws are.

Paying for sex is legal in Canada. Soliciting, or talking openly about what you expect to be paid for those sexual favours, is against the law.

So is asking a would-be client about little things, like whether they will wear a condom or have a sexually transmitted disease, before you climb into their car for a quick romp.

Inviting a sex worker into your home or hotel room is legal. Invite a john into your flat, and you court arrest for running a bawdy house.

Such conflicting restrictions are common in European countries that permit prostitution clearly showing that, despite their more rational attitudes about sex, they still consider sex workers to be an underclass unworthy of the same rights and privileges of other citizens.  As a result, prostitutes are often faced with unnecessary risks that are solely a function of politics and social intolerance.

“We believe sex workers have the right to live and work safely, in an environment free of violence and discrimination,” a statement signed by 40 professors, lawyers and community activists says.

“Current laws force sex workers to work in dangerous conditions and compromise their access to police protection, which in turn renders them even more vulnerable to violence.”

So, who supports legal prostitution in Canada?

Last month, an Angus Reid poll found roughly half of all Canadians – but most men – supported decriminalization of prostitution, and believed prostitutes should be allowed to work indoors or in brothels for safety’s sake.

So, who opposes the measures to make it safer for women?  You guessed it: Anti-trafficking folks to whom the only goal is the complete eradication of prostitution no matter who they hurt in the process.  At least the Canadian Press seems to give voice to both sides whereas in the U.S., the mainstream press is largely blind to any point of view aside from that of the rescue industry.

A few miscellaneous lunchtime links

Wednesday, November 3rd, 2010
  • Stings have become standard as a means for achieving high arrest rates when it comes to prostitution (not to mention drugs).   As depressing as that is, the comments you see under such stories are encouraging.  As with this story about an operation in Birmingham, people tend to think its a waste of resources and shouldn’t be a crime to begin with.
  • Another disturbing strategy I’m seeing is the increasing use of anti-prostitution sweeps and stings as a means to seize people’s cars simply as a revenue source.  I recently wrote about a Detroit sweep that seized 70 cars and today there is a story of Canadian operation that seized 11 vehicles.  The state usually makes money on seizures independent of whether the owner is ever charged or found guilty, thereby creating perverse incentives for law enforcement to target innocent people.   Used in the drug war for years, the expansion of this practice into other consensual crime areas shows the government’s desperation for creative finance measures to compensate for fiscal recklessness.
  • South Korea is a master of mass prostitution arrests.  After an investigation of a bar, they recently arrested “252 male visitors and 37 alleged prostitutes – including 37 civil servants, working for government or state-run companies, 94 professionals, such as doctors, accountants and businessman and 121 others. The three owners of the bar were also arrested.”  It doesn’t say whether they seized everyone’s car but they have clearly saved the country from a bunch of guys who wanted to get laid.

    If a tree falls in the woods and there’s no one there to hear it, does it make a sound?

    Who cares?

    If, however, a woman falls down with a man for money in Clayton and no one knows about it or is hurt by it, will it get you arrested?

    You bet.

  • The U.S. Supreme court hears arguments over California’s new law that makes it a crime to sell a violent video game to anyone under 18.

Cool Ontario sex show ad too close to schools

Tuesday, November 2nd, 2010

According to thespec.com:

The owner of a sex trade-show says he’s sorry for running a risqué billboard advertisement next door to several Hamilton elementary schools.

“Several”?  Do they group their elementary schools in clusters?

Levitt said he scouted high-traffic billboard sites, and agrees the ads should not have gone up next to schools. “I don’t mind controversy, but we certainly don’t want to anger or upset people. I agree that right on a corner by an elementary school is not doing us any good if it’s upsetting people.”

Wait a doggone second.  I though controversy went hand in hand with upsetting and angering people.  :)   Well, it sounds like the guy is at least trying to be somewhat deferential about it by apologizing.   I think it’s pretty damn funny.  In the U.S. his house probably would have been firebombed while he was in prison awaiting trial for disseminating porn to prepubesent children (all of whom would no doubt require lifelong treatment for PTSD).

Canada’s anti-prostitution law struck down

Wednesday, September 29th, 2010

While prostitution is not banned in Canada, it is saddled with so many draconian restrictions that it could hardly be called legal.

From CBC:

An Ontario court has thrown out key provisions of Canada’s anti-prostitution laws in response to a constitutional challenge by a Toronto dominatrix and two prostitutes in 2009.

Ontario’s Superior Court of Justice ruled Tuesday the Criminal Code provisions relating to prostitution contribute to the danger faced by sex-trade workers.

What a novel idea!  Actual concern for the welfare of adult prostitutes.

Dominatrix Terri-Jean Bedford, Valerie Scott and Amy Lebovitch had argued that prohibitions on keeping a common bawdy house, communicating for the purposes of prostitution and living on the avails of the trade force them from the safety of their homes to face violence on the streets.

If only such liberty could dribble down across the border into the “land of the free”.

“We don’t have to worry about being raped and robbed and murdered,” [Valerie Scott] said. “This decision means that sex workers can now pick up the phone, and call the police and report a bad client. This means that we no longer have to be afraid, that we can work with the appropriate authorities.”

Moreover, sex workers can set up guilds and associations, health standards, workers’ compensation programs, as well as pay income tax. “We want to be good citizens and it’s time, now we finally can,” said Scott.

It’s only a matter of time before the anti-prostitution crusaders show up to pee in the punch bowl.  If there’s anything that pisses of the rescue industry, its a hooker who refuses to be a victim.

Wait.  They’re already there:

Some conservative groups such as REAL Women of Canada, which had intervener status in the case, argued that decriminalizing prostitution may make Canada a haven for human trafficking and that prostitution is harmful to the women involved in it.

Maybe I’m just not paying attention, but I rarely hear anyone proclaim how men are supposed to think and behave as if they were all mindless drones subservient to one central intelligence.  And yet, you can’t read an article about any kind of sex trade without some organization defining what’s right and wrong for all members of the female sex.  I can certainly see why some women get irate when some religious crusader or militant feminist implies that they are too fucking stupid to make their own decisions.    What I can’t understand is why all women don’t  get irate at such a suggestion.

Rate your hooker

Wednesday, September 15th, 2010

At bigthink.com, Canadian economist Marina Adshade talks about websites that permit customers to rate their experiences with prostitutes.    She speculates on the gold mine of information that could be culled from such a data base.  Also, her article is a nice break from the hysteria about how the internet is kidnapping America’s youth and selling them as sex slaves (with free shipping for orders over $25).

The idea of rating prostitutes is innovative.  If a similar rating system could be instituted for customers, it could result in the biggest safety improvement for prostitutes since the invention of online advertising…

Selling sex: first it was craigslist, now Facebook

Tuesday, May 18th, 2010

The sex trade in Calgary Canada is moving off the streets and into cyberspace.  This is nothing new, of course.  Nary a day goes by without some news story popping up about how craiglist is facilitating prostitution and should stop (as if they have the responsibility or the resources to police every ad that gets listed).  But, so far, most negative press about Facebook has focused on personal privacy issues and their rather sleazy policy of making it next to impossible to remove your account.

CBC News is reporting that Facebook is helping prostitutes to stay legal in Calgary.  Unlike in most of  U.S. (aka “the land of the free”) prostitution isn’t a crime in Canada, although they have a lot of laws aimed at making it fairly impossible to practice safely and legally.

Police said street prostitution accounts for only 10 per cent of the city’s sex trade, which means fewer johns are looking for hookers on the street.

Yep, the street is one of those places where it’s illegal.

[Staff Sgt. Colin Adair, of the city's vice unit] said selling or buying sex in private is illegal if it’s done in public spaces.

I only had to read that three times to figure out what he’s trying to say.

But the privacy of online solicitation allows the sex trade to operate legally, said Adair.

CBC is doing a series of stories this week called “Sex for Sale”.  I wonder if they will resist the rescue industry slant that insults all thinking women by labeling them as mindless victims of exploitation if they claim to pursue sex work by choice.  My guess is that they will probably be uncritically repeating whatever “human trafficking” statistical propaganda they are fed by the anti-sex crusaders, but we’ll see.

I should note, however, that many of the comments are encouraging.  Apparently many people think sex is something personal.  Imagine that!

Quebecers need instructions for their dildos?

Friday, April 30th, 2010

A court in Quebec has ruled that sex toys sold in Quebec must be labeled in French.  Apparently, there is some concern that citizens of Quebec might need guidance from the manufacturer on their proper use.

Their is nothing in the story about how the people of Quebec feel about the government’s low opinion of their ability to engage in sexual activities without the state protecting them from the dangers of English-only dildos.  If they’re like people in the U.S., they might welcome government hand-holding in the bedroom.  After all, several southern states in the U.S. don’t permit the sale of sex toys at all, but the voters keep right on re-electing the legislators who passed those laws.

Magazine, ‘The Beaver’, changes its name

Monday, March 29th, 2010

According to the BBC, Canadian magazine, “The Beaver” is changing its name to “Canada’s History” to avoid being blocked by internet filters.

Back in the 50s and 60s there was a very family-oriented TV sitcom called “Leave it to Beaver“.  The main character was referred to as “The Beaver” (or The Beav).  I doubt it would be named that now.