Archive for the ‘Civil Commitment’ Category

Castrating sex offenders to save money

Thursday, January 27th, 2011

A Virginia state legislator wants the state to consider castrating sex offenders so they don’t have to spend all that money keeping them locked up indefinitely in psychiatric “hospitals” after they’ve completed their prison sentences.

From the HuffPo:

Republican Sen. Emmett Hanger’s bill would require the state to study the use of physical castration as an alternative to civil commitment for sexually violent predators.

The civil commitment program’s budget grew from $2.7 million in 2004 to $24 million this year. Gov. Bob McDonnell has proposed spending nearly $70 million over the next two years to meet the increasing demands.

According to the article, Texas and Louisiana already allow for physical castration.

It’s interesting to see government officials in a quandary over the high cost of using the gimmick of civil commitment to heap additional punishment on people who have already paid for their crimes.  There is no doubt that they would have no compunction about summarily executing sex offenders at the end of their prison term if they could only devise some fiction that could justify it.

And the public would applaud.

Thanks to Maggie McNeil for the link.

Civil commitment, California style

Monday, January 3rd, 2011

Sex Hysteria reader, Richard, posted a link to a youtube documentary in the comments under a post I did several days ago about civil commitment.

I was pretty busy over the holidays with out-of-town family visitors staying with us, but I finally manged to catch up and view this documentary about California’s Coalinga “mental hospital” where they house convicted sex offenders who have served their time, but remain incarcerated under civil commitment procedures.  I must say, this documentary is well worth watching.    To quote my own comment after seeing it:

On the one hand, there are those in the treatment program who willing to say and do anything the staff wants them to in hopes that they will be one of the very few who eventually gain their freedom. On the other hand, there are the 70% those who refuse treatment and are warehoused with no hope of being released except through the courts. It’s the classic authoritarian witch hunt mentality. By denying that they are a danger to society, they are confirming that they are indeed danger to society and must remain incarcerated.

The entire documentary is pretty sickening, reminiscent of the re-education of Winston Smith in Nineteen Eighty-Four or the behavioral modification of Alex in A Clockwork Orange.

I highly recommend visiting youtube to watch all six parts (totally about 1 hour).

How’s that civil commitment thing working out?

Sunday, December 26th, 2010

New York is finding that the average cost to the taxpayers for each sex offender subjected to civil commitment is $175,000, more than any other similar program in the country.

Civil commitment is the process by which the state can continue to incarcerate a sex offender indefinitely after he’s completed his prison sentence.

In the old days, a person had to be convicted in a criminal court in order to be sent to prison.  Not only that, but the range of prison time was prescribed by law.  But the times, they are a changin’.   Now, the state can hold a closed civil hearing, out of the public eye and extend the inmate’s incarceration based on a wild guess about whether the inmate is likely to commit a future crime.  Yes, it’s like the movie Minority Report except worse, since it operates without the benefit of precogs who can actually see into the future.  This masterpiece of judicial palmistry permits open-ended incarceration, but at substantial cost.

Although only a small percentage of the pool of convicted sex offenders ends up civilly institutionalized in New York, the state still has one of the highest rates of civil confinement in the country, records show.

For New York lawmakers, this will create a demand for tens of millions of tax dollars in coming years at the same time that officials face dire budgetary constraints.

And then there are the court costs associated with experts who conjure up, from their crystal balls, different versions of the future:

The courtroom fights over civil commitment have their own costs, often outstripping the costs of criminal cases.

Civil commitment hearings and trials can become a duel between psychiatric experts warring over whether the offender has a “mental abnormality” that makes him unable to control criminal impulses — a legal requirement for confinement.

And then there’s the space issue:

New York operates two facilities where the detained sex offenders are treated — the Central New York Psychiatric Center in Marcy near Rome and the St. Lawrence Psychiatric Center in Ogdensburg. Both centers are now at capacity — 150 beds at Central and 80 at St. Lawrence.

An unused building at Marcy could be converted into space for 150 beds, but that transformation would come with costs that have not yet been determined.

OMH is talking with corrections officials about the conversion of some unused prison space, but those discussions are only in preliminary phases.At the current rate of growth — about 70 newly confined offenders annually — treatment costs alone will grow by about $12 million a year. OMH has already trimmed its costs by reducing staff at facilities; originally the average cost per offender was $225,000 a year.

What’s clear is that solutions to the space crunch, regardless of the cost, will be needed soon.

The drug war, war on terror, and sexual predator hysteria are the three primary mechanisms by which the government has been able to circumvent almost every civil liberty we once thought were unassailable.  And, thanks to the complicity of the mainstream press, the public is largely scared into acquiescence by a  continuous barrage of fear mongering.  And it’s been accelerating at a stunning rate.

Most sex crimes committed by 1st time offenders

Tuesday, February 2nd, 2010

Melissa D. Grady, a teacher at the UNC-Chapel Hill School of Social Work, has an interesting opinion piece on newsobserver.com regarding the effectiveness of registering sex offenders.

She points to a study covering ten years before Megan’s Law to ten years after Megan’s Law was enacted and comments:

This study found that even after the passage of the registration law, there was no change in the rate of sex crimes because more than 96 percent of all sexual crimes are committed by first-time offenders.

The entire article is worth reading because it really makes a convincing case that registering sex offenders or keeping them locked up under civil confinement are largely a huge waste of money.

Court questions Constitutionality of Jessica’s Law

Friday, January 29th, 2010

The California Supreme Court ruled 5-2 yesterday that treating sex offenders differently from others under civil confinement may violate the  constitutional guarantees of equal treatment and ordered a fact finding  hearing.

The majority said the state must provide “some justification” for creating greater obstacles for sex predators to win their freedom than for severely mentally disordered offenders who commit crimes but serve their terms in mental institutions.

Considering the wording of the published opinion, they seem to leave a lot of leeway for the lower court to uphold the law with minimal justification.